U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blue Prism AD01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

You identify an element in Application Modeller but when you highlight or use that element Blue Prism gives you an error message saying that duplicate elements were found.Which of the following statements is true?
A) It is common for duplicate elements to be found based upon the attributes that are ticked by default using the Blue Prism product. Time needs to be spent experimenting with the attribute ticks until a unique, reliable, and consistent selection of attributes are found.
B) It will not be possible to interface with the element in a unique way. You will need to use Surface Automation techniques for this element.
C) A code stage interface will need to be created and used for this application, this will give you more flexibility to interact with the application elements.
D) You will need to make the attributes you have selected dynamic. This will allow your flow to loop around, incrementing the attribute value until the correct element is found and used.

Blue Prism AD01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blue Prism's AD01 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All AD01 Questions]

You identify an element in Application Modeller but when you highlight or use that element Blue Prism gives you an error message saying that duplicate elements were found.

Which of the following statements is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Reason: Is is common as the duplicate elements we are found by default as the attributes are provided by the application not by the blue prism. how do make our elements unique is not done by practicing and experience. ( This is also mentioned in the Foundation course and as well as in other Pdf too)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gussie
8 months ago
A code stage might be overkill for this. Just tweak the attributes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
8 months ago
Totally agree, experimenting with attributes is key to solving this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
8 months ago
Surprised to hear about needing dynamic attributes! That sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
8 months ago
I disagree, using Surface Automation is often a better solution for duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
8 months ago
Yeah, I've seen that error before. It's usually about those default attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. The XML has two namespaces declared, but the eMail element is using a prefix. I'll need to think this through carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
9 months ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully consider the characteristics of each group and how they should be modeled in the new system. I'm not 100% sure, but I think option D might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
9 months ago
I've got a good handle on this topic. I'll make sure to hit the key points around how the API provider needs to manage the process of exposing their capabilities, including things like versioning, authentication, and monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. HTML5 is the newest version, so it should support the most recent CSS standards. I'm pretty sure that's CSS2 and CSS3, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by the question. The packet exchange doesn't seem to clearly show the adjacency state. I'll need to think through the OSPF adjacency process step-by-step to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel