MENU
Determining if a transaction is part of the distributed ledger is less computationally intensive in DAG-based solutions than in blockchain
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CBSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
GR
Graham
10 months ago
Yeah, less computational work is a big plus for DAGs!
MO
Mozell
10 months ago
Surprised to hear that! I thought blockchain was always better.
VI
Viki
10 months ago
I disagree, blockchain has its own advantages.
WI
Willard
11 months ago
Not so sure about that, I've seen mixed results.
RO
Rose
11 months ago
That's definitely true! DAGs are more efficient.
LY
Lynelle
11 months ago
I remember reading that DAGs can handle transactions differently, but I can't recall if that directly translates to being less computationally intensive.
CO
Corinne
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused because I recall some practice questions suggesting that both have their own efficiencies, but I think DAGs are generally more efficient.
OL
Olene
12 months ago
I feel like we discussed how blockchain requires more computational power due to its consensus mechanisms, so I lean towards true for this question.
SC
Scarlet
12 months ago
I think I remember that DAGs allow for more parallel processing, which might make transaction verification less intensive, but I'm not entirely sure.
CA
Carman
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is that in a DAG-based system, each transaction only needs to validate a small portion of the overall graph, rather than the entire chain like in a blockchain. This should make the verification process more efficient and less computationally intensive. I'll make sure to explain that clearly in my answer.
DA
Daron
1 year ago
Wait, I'm confused. Isn't the whole point of a blockchain that it's more secure and tamper-resistant than a DAG-based system? I'm not sure I buy the idea that DAG-based solutions are less computationally intensive for transaction verification. I'll have to re-read the material on this.
SA
Salley
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key difference is that in a blockchain, each new block needs to be validated against the entire chain, whereas in a DAG-based system, each transaction only needs to be validated against a subset of the overall graph. This should make the verification process less computationally intensive. I'm confident I can answer this correctly.
DE
Deeann
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know DAG-based solutions like IOTA have some advantages in terms of scalability, but I'm not sure if that translates to lower computational complexity for transaction verification. I'll have to think this through carefully.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
I think this question is asking about the computational complexity of verifying transactions in DAG-based vs. blockchain-based distributed ledgers. I'll need to review my notes on the differences between these two architectures.
AN
Anabel
1 year ago
Wait, so the question is about computational intensity in DAG-based solutions? I thought we were talking about 'Drag-based' solutions. You know, like when you drag and drop files on your computer. My bad!
TI
Tina
1 year ago
Yeah, it's comparing the computational intensity between DAG-based and blockchain solutions.
ER
Ernie
1 year ago
Oh, I see what you mean now. It's about the computational intensity in DAG-based solutions.
MO
Moon
1 year ago
B) False
FL
Flo
1 year ago
A) True
RE
Reid
1 year ago
Haha, this question is a piece of cake! Blockchain? More like 'blockedchain', am I right?
FI
Fidelia
1 year ago
True
LE
Leah
1 year ago
Haha, you got it! DAG-based solutions are definitely less computationally intensive.
YU
Yuki
1 year ago
B) False
TA
Tawna
1 year ago
A) True
CA
Carmela
1 year ago
Haha, you got it! DAG-based solutions are definitely less computationally intensive.
EL
Elly
1 year ago
A) True
GR
Graham
2 years ago
Well, duh! Of course, it's less computationally intensive in DAG-based solutions. I could've told you that with my eyes closed.
BE
Belen
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Blockchain has its own advantages, you know. Gotta weigh the pros and cons.
BR
Brandon
1 year ago
Yeah, blockchain may have its advantages, but when it comes to computational intensity, DAG-based solutions have the upper hand.
KI
King
1 year ago
A) True
JA
Jacquline
1 year ago
I think you're right. DAG-based solutions are designed to be more efficient in terms of transaction verification.
JU
Justa
1 year ago
A) True
VI
Vilma
2 years ago
Yup, that's definitely true. DAG-based solutions are way more efficient when it comes to verifying transactions on the distributed ledger.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
B) False
AN
Anisha
1 year ago
That's right, the structure of DAG allows for parallel processing of transactions, making it more efficient than blockchain.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
Absolutely, DAG-based solutions are designed to make transaction verification faster and less computationally intensive.
JA
Jame
1 year ago
A) True
CA
Catina
2 years ago
I agree with Pamella, DAG-based solutions are designed to be less computationally intensive
LA
Lavonda
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) False
PA
Pamella
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) True