Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain CBSP Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Using a distributed ledger decreases risk of data loss since all data is not stored in the same place.
B) False
A) True

Blockchain CBSP Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSP exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All CBSP Questions]

Using a distributed ledger decreases risk of data loss since all data is not stored in the same place.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jolene at Mar 10, 2024, 08:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gene
6 months ago
Not sure if it's foolproof though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
7 months ago
True, redundancy is key in data storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
7 months ago
Surprised this isn't more common knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
7 months ago
But what about security breaches?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
7 months ago
Totally agree, distributed ledgers are way safer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
7 months ago
I feel like it could be false too, depending on how the distributed ledger is managed. What if all nodes are compromised?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question about data redundancy in distributed systems, and I think that supports the idea that it's true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how centralization can lead to single points of failure. Maybe that's why it's true?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
8 months ago
I think it's true because distributed ledgers spread the data across multiple nodes, which should reduce the risk of losing everything if one part fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
8 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know distributed ledgers are more secure, but I'm not sure if that directly translates to decreased risk of data loss. I'll have to think it through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is true. The whole point of a distributed ledger is to have redundancy and prevent a single point of failure, which reduces the risk of data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the data is distributed, then even if one node fails, the data is still available on other nodes. That seems to support the "True" answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know distributed ledgers spread data across multiple nodes, but I'm not sure if that necessarily decreases the overall risk of data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
8 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The key is understanding how distributed ledgers work to reduce the risk of data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
8 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the Media Gateway sends an INVITE request to the GVP's SIP Session Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
8 months ago
Wait, is it just "AccountName" without the curly braces? I'm a bit confused on the syntax here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
8 months ago
Alright, I've got this. I'll start by identifying the different salary ranges, then consider the marital status, and finally the number of children. Shouldn't be too hard to work out the total number of input classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
Distributed ledgers are like a game of musical chairs - the data is always finding a new home to avoid being lost. ClAletar, eh?
upvoted 0 times
Deeanna
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
1 year ago
That's a good analogy! Distributed ledgers do help decrease the risk of data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'distributed means not in one place' trick. Nice try, but I'm not falling for it!
upvoted 0 times
Amber
1 year ago
User 2: B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
User 1: A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
1 year ago
I agree with Ezekiel. Having data stored in multiple locations makes it more secure and less prone to loss or tampering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Isn't the data replicated across multiple nodes in a distributed ledger? I'll have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
True. With a distributed ledger, data is replicated across multiple nodes, reducing the risk of data loss if one node fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
Using a distributed ledger decreases risk of data loss since all data is not stored in the same place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
1 year ago
False, that's not how distributed ledgers work. The data is still distributed, not stored in one place.
upvoted 0 times
Justa
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
1 year ago
False, that's not how distributed ledgers work. The data is still distributed, not stored in one place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alona
1 year ago
True, that's the whole point of a distributed ledger! Redundancy is key to preventing data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel