MENU
Consider the following scenario: Due to consistent inaccuracies and outdated real estate listings, a residential real estate company wants to build a blockchain solution that accurately depicts which homes (assets) are available for purchase across all countries/provinces. All available homes should be publicly viewable by the general consumer audience, but certain details of the home, such as history of maintenance, should only be viewable by licensed real estate professionals.
Which architecture would best solve the product need?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CBSA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
HO
Hoa
11 months ago
Isn't a private blockchain just limiting access too much?
OR
Ora
11 months ago
Totally agree with D, it balances public access and privacy.
VI
Vivan
11 months ago
Wait, how can we trust a public blockchain for sensitive data?
DI
Diane
12 months ago
I think a hybrid approach (Option C) could work too!
CR
Cristal
12 months ago
Option D seems like the best fit for transparency and security.
AN
Angella
12 months ago
I think option A could work, but I worry about the security of the privileged data. We discussed how important it is to keep sensitive information safe in our last class.
BL
Blair
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether a hybrid blockchain would really meet the needs here. I thought public access was crucial, but I’m not sure how that fits with the need for restricted data.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
This reminds me of a practice question we did about data privacy in blockchain. I think option D might be the right choice since it separates public and privileged data effectively.
SH
Shantell
1 year ago
I remember studying the differences between public and private blockchains, but I'm not sure which architecture would be best for this scenario.
TA
Tashia
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Having the entire solution on a private blockchain with proper permissions could work well and keep everything secure.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a public and private blockchain. I'll need to review those concepts before attempting this.
NI
Nida
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about blockchain architecture. I think the key is balancing public access with data privacy.
TR
Trinidad
1 year ago
Option D looks like the best fit to me. Separating the public and privileged data onto different blockchains makes the most sense for this use case.
AL
Alex
1 year ago
This looks straightforward. The average number of defects is given as 21.6, so I just need to plug that into the formula and calculate the upper control limit. I'm confident I can get the right answer.
VE
Veronica
1 year ago
Option D for sure. Letting the public see the available homes while keeping the maintenance history private is a smart move. Blockchain for the win!
LI
Linwood
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old public vs. private blockchain debate. I'd go with D, just to avoid any 'blockchain inception' with a private blockchain inside a public one.
AL
Almeta
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards B, having everything on a private blockchain with proper permissions seems like a secure choice.
TI
Timothy
1 year ago
I think A could work too, as long as the security measures for the private database are strong enough.
MI
Milly
1 year ago
I agree with you, D seems like the most straightforward option to keep public and privileged data separate.
TU
Tula
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C. A hybrid blockchain with Proof of Stake consensus could provide the best of both worlds - public transparency and privileged data security.
EU
Eulah
1 year ago
C) Public and privileged data on hybrid blockchain will Proof of Stake consensus
GA
Garry
1 year ago
B) The entire solution built on a private blockchain with proper permissions for both public and privileged data
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
A) Public data hosted on a public blockchain, Privileged data security hoisted on a private database
JO
Joesph
2 years ago
B seems like a solid choice. A private blockchain with proper permissions could handle both the public and privileged data requirements, simplifying the overall architecture.
YO
Yoko
1 year ago
It's important to ensure that only licensed professionals can view certain details of the homes, so a private blockchain makes sense.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I agree, having everything on a private blockchain would provide better control over who can access the data.
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
B seems like a solid choice. A private blockchain with proper permissions could handle both the public and privileged data requirements, simplifying the overall architecture.
DA
Dante
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option D makes the most sense. Keeping the public data on a public blockchain ensures transparency, while the privileged data on a private blockchain maintains security for the real estate professionals.
ST
Steffanie
1 year ago
That's a good point, a hybrid blockchain could offer a good compromise between transparency and security.
NI
Nilsa
1 year ago
But wouldn't a hybrid blockchain with Proof of Stake consensus provide the best of both worlds?
DA
Dana
1 year ago
I think option B could also work well, with proper permissions on a private blockchain.
DU
Dusti
1 year ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice for balancing transparency and security.
MI
Minna
2 years ago
But with option B, we can still provide access to public data while keeping privileged data secure.
MI
Micaela
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more secure.
MI
Minna
2 years ago
I think option B would be the best choice.