Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain CBSA Exam - Topic 6 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSA exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 6
[All CBSA Questions]

Chaincode Services uses Docker to host (deploy) the chaincode without relying on any virtual machine or computer language.

What would be the main reason or best reason that Hyperledger chose containers over virtual machines?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Rebecka at Nov 22, 2023, 04:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Von
5 months ago
I heard Docker is super compatible with Linux, makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
5 months ago
Isn't it risky to not have a "locked down" environment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure Docker can't support more languages?
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
6 months ago
I agree, containers are way more efficient for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
6 months ago
Docker is definitely lightweight compared to VMs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
6 months ago
I recall that Docker's compatibility with Linux was mentioned in our readings, but I don't think the upgrade subscription is the main reason for choosing it over VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the "locked down" part. I thought Docker was meant to provide flexibility, but maybe I misinterpreted that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
6 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about the security features of Docker, and it emphasized the sandboxing aspect, which seems relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
7 months ago
I remember discussing how Docker's lightweight nature is a big advantage over virtual machines, but I'm not sure if "not locked down" is the right phrase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
7 months ago
Based on my understanding of Hyperledger and the benefits of containers, I think the answer is A. Containers offer a more secure and lightweight way to run chaincode without the overhead of a full VM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem to be getting at some nuanced differences between containers and VMs, but I'm not sure I fully grasp the implications for Hyperledger. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
7 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A. Containers provide a more lightweight and efficient way to run chaincode compared to full virtual machines, which is likely why Hyperledger chose that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. The options mention things like "locked down" and "additional programming languages", which I'm not sure I fully understand in the context of Hyperledger and chaincode. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
7 months ago
This question seems straightforward - it's asking about the main reason Hyperledger chose containers over virtual machines. I think the answer is likely A, since containers provide a secured, lightweight way to sandbox chaincode execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
7 months ago
Based on the requirements around uninterrupted access and handling failures, I believe Oracle Data Guard is the right choice here. It's designed for disaster recovery and failover scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
7 months ago
Ugh, these healthcare acronym questions always trip me up. I'll narrow it down by ruling out the acts I know are about different topics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
7 months ago
I think I remember that you can choose multiple software versions in E-MapReduce, so I'm leaning towards True.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice to me. The 'not locked down' part is crucial - we need that flexibility for our chaincode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
11 months ago
Haha, 'locked down' security? I hope Hyperledger doesn't take that too literally, otherwise we'll all be chained to our desks!
upvoted 0 times
Glory
11 months ago
A) Haha, hopefully not literally chained to our desks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
B) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down'' but additional programming languages cannot be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
11 months ago
A) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down''.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sommer
12 months ago
Hold on, I think option B is the correct answer. Docker may provide a secure sandbox, but it doesn't allow for additional programming languages to be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
10 months ago
User3: I'm not sure, but I think option D might be the correct answer. Docker is compatible with Hyperledger and Linux.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
10 months ago
User2: I agree with User1, Docker does provide a secure sandbox for chaincode execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
11 months ago
User1: I think option A is the best reason. Docker provides a secured sandbox for chaincode execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scarlet
1 year ago
I agree, Docker's ability to run chaincode without relying on virtual machines is a major advantage. The 'locked down' security is a key selling point.
upvoted 0 times
Bev
10 months ago
B) The 'locked down' security is a key selling point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
10 months ago
A) I agree, Docker's ability to run chaincode without relying on virtual machines is a major advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
11 months ago
B) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down'' but additional programming languages cannot be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
12 months ago
A) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down''.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reiko
1 year ago
I believe Docker is the best choice because it is compatible with Hyperledger and Linux, making it a reliable option for hosting chaincode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
1 year ago
Docker containers are definitely the way to go for Hyperledger. The lightweight and secure sandbox environment is perfect for chaincode execution.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
11 months ago
B) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down'' but additional programming languages cannot be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
11 months ago
A) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down''.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
11 months ago
B) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down'' but additional programming languages cannot be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
11 months ago
A) Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution that is not ''locked down''.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
1 year ago
I agree with Kenny. Docker allows for secure execution of chaincode without being too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I think Hyperledger chose containers over virtual machines because Docker provides a secured, lightweight method to sandbox chaincode execution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel