MENU
Consider the following scenario. A startup is building a chat app for smart phones where the messages sent between users are anonymous and get destroyed within 24 hours of being sent.
Which architecture would best solve the product need?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CBSA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TA
Tamala
11 months ago
I’m surprised they’re considering blockchain at all for this.
JE
Jenifer
11 months ago
Wait, how can messages be truly anonymous on a blockchain?
GL
Gladis
11 months ago
A is interesting, but using Ethereum for this feels overkill.
DO
Dong
12 months ago
I disagree, B seems more straightforward for just chat messages.
LA
Laticia
12 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense for privacy.
BE
Ben
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it combines both private and public elements, but I’m unsure if Proof of Stake is necessary for this scenario.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about chat app architectures, and I feel like a hybrid solution might balance security and performance well.
PO
Portia
1 year ago
I think a private blockchain could work for message persistence, but I’m not confident if it meets the 24-hour destruction requirement.
NA
Nakita
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how anonymity is crucial for chat apps, but I'm not sure which blockchain option would best support that.
VI
Vinnie
1 year ago
This is right up my alley! I'd go with option A. Ethereum's smart contracts are perfect for managing the anonymous tokens, and the mobile apps can easily integrate with the JSON-RPC interface. Seems like the most robust and scalable solution.
DI
Dierdre
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is balancing the need for anonymity and message expiration with the technical complexity. I'm leaning towards option D - the hybrid blockchain approach could give us the best of both worlds.
WE
Wei
1 year ago
Hmm, the blockchain options seem interesting, but I'm not sure if they're really necessary for this use case. I might lean towards the simpler multi-tier system approach in option C.
LA
Lavonna
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the requirements around the anonymous and self-destructing messages. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach carefully.
CH
Chantay
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards the bar chart with a logarithmic scale. That should help us visualize the relationship between the KPIs even with the wide value ranges.
KA
Kandis
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward multiple choice question, so I'll carefully read through each option and select the ones that seem to match the components of the FusionSphErE Cloud Suite Standard Edition.
MI
Michal
1 year ago
I keep mixing up REM and RBI in my notes. I feel like both deal with maintenance, but one focuses more on risk management, right?
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
Ethereum, blockchain, token management? This startup is really going all-out, huh? I bet the CEO has been watching too many Silicon Valley episodes.
PE
Penney
1 year ago
Hybrid blockchain? Proof of Stake? Yikes, this is getting way too technical. I think I'll just go with the option that doesn't involve any blockchain at all. Less headache, you know?
GR
Gregoria
1 year ago
Token management for shareholders in a public blockchain? That's just asking for trouble. I'd steer clear of anything blockchain-related and stick to a tried-and-true architecture.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
A private blockchain for chat messages? Really? Sounds like a lot of unnecessary complexity. I'd go with option C and keep it simple.
DO
Domitila
1 year ago
Let's go with option C then, keep it simple and effective.
HI
Hillary
1 year ago
Yeah, a private blockchain for chat messages does seem like overkill.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
I agree, using a public blockchain for token management seems like a good idea.
CA
Cassandra
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. It keeps things simple and efficient.
LA
Lakeesha
1 year ago
Ethereum for token management and chat messages? That's overkill for a simple chat app! Might as well just use a database and save the hassle.
GE
Georgene
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe a private blockchain would be a better option for this scenario.
LI
Lina
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, using Ethereum seems unnecessary for a chat app.
KR
Kristel
1 year ago
User 1: Ethereum for token management and chat messages? That's overkill for a simple chat app! Might as well just use a database and save the hassle.
UN
Una
2 years ago
Why do you think option D is better?
TE
Teddy
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go.
UN
Una
2 years ago
I think option A would be the best choice.