Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain CBSA Exam - Topic 1 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSA exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 1
[All CBSA Questions]

Consider the following scenario. A startup is building a chat app for smart phones where the messages sent between users are anonymous and get destroyed within 24 hours of being sent.

Which architecture would best solve the product need?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sage at Jul 17, 2024, 01:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tamala
5 months ago
I’m surprised they’re considering blockchain at all for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
5 months ago
Wait, how can messages be truly anonymous on a blockchain?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
5 months ago
A is interesting, but using Ethereum for this feels overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
6 months ago
I disagree, B seems more straightforward for just chat messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
6 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense for privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it combines both private and public elements, but I’m unsure if Proof of Stake is necessary for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question about chat app architectures, and I feel like a hybrid solution might balance security and performance well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
6 months ago
I think a private blockchain could work for message persistence, but I’m not confident if it meets the 24-hour destruction requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
7 months ago
I remember we discussed how anonymity is crucial for chat apps, but I'm not sure which blockchain option would best support that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
7 months ago
This is right up my alley! I'd go with option A. Ethereum's smart contracts are perfect for managing the anonymous tokens, and the mobile apps can easily integrate with the JSON-RPC interface. Seems like the most robust and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is balancing the need for anonymity and message expiration with the technical complexity. I'm leaning towards option D - the hybrid blockchain approach could give us the best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
7 months ago
Hmm, the blockchain options seem interesting, but I'm not sure if they're really necessary for this use case. I might lean towards the simpler multi-tier system approach in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
7 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the requirements around the anonymous and self-destructing messages. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards the bar chart with a logarithmic scale. That should help us visualize the relationship between the KPIs even with the wide value ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
7 months ago
This looks like a straightforward multiple choice question, so I'll carefully read through each option and select the ones that seem to match the components of the FusionSphErE Cloud Suite Standard Edition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
7 months ago
I keep mixing up REM and RBI in my notes. I feel like both deal with maintenance, but one focuses more on risk management, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
11 months ago
Ethereum, blockchain, token management? This startup is really going all-out, huh? I bet the CEO has been watching too many Silicon Valley episodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
11 months ago
Hybrid blockchain? Proof of Stake? Yikes, this is getting way too technical. I think I'll just go with the option that doesn't involve any blockchain at all. Less headache, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
11 months ago
Token management for shareholders in a public blockchain? That's just asking for trouble. I'd steer clear of anything blockchain-related and stick to a tried-and-true architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
A private blockchain for chat messages? Really? Sounds like a lot of unnecessary complexity. I'd go with option C and keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
Domitila
10 months ago
Let's go with option C then, keep it simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
10 months ago
Yeah, a private blockchain for chat messages does seem like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
10 months ago
I agree, using a public blockchain for token management seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
11 months ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. It keeps things simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lakeesha
11 months ago
Ethereum for token management and chat messages? That's overkill for a simple chat app! Might as well just use a database and save the hassle.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
10 months ago
User 3: Maybe a private blockchain would be a better option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, using Ethereum seems unnecessary for a chat app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
10 months ago
User 1: Ethereum for token management and chat messages? That's overkill for a simple chat app! Might as well just use a database and save the hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Una
1 year ago
Why do you think option D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
1 year ago
I think option A would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel