MENU
Using truffle-contract over Web3.js:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CBDE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
DA
Dahlia
8 months ago
B makes sense. Web3.js is still evolving, so Truffle helps a lot.
CA
Cammy
9 months ago
A feels too strong. Not every developer needs Truffle.
AL
Alison
9 months ago
I find Truffle-Contract really helpful for managing transactions!
KI
Kindra
9 months ago
They're definitely different, but both have their uses.
JE
Jesus
9 months ago
Wait, Web3.js is still in beta? That's surprising!
RA
Raylene
9 months ago
I'd rather use a Turing-complete programming language than deal with this blockchain nonsense.
LO
Loren
9 months ago
A) is a must for every developer, because Web3.js changes so often.
NI
Nichelle
10 months ago
B) is a convenient way because Web3.js is currently still in beta and truffle-contract can handle transactions with JavaScript-promises.
WI
Winfred
10 months ago
C) they are both completely different things. Truffle-Contract is a framework while Web3.js is a library.
TA
Tawanna
10 months ago
I definitely remember that Web3.js is a library, but I’m not entirely clear on how Truffle-Contract fits into the picture.
ME
Melissia
10 months ago
I agree with C. They serve different purposes. Can't mix them up.
AN
Antione
10 months ago
Totally agree, Web3.js updates can be a headache!
CH
Christiane
10 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Truffle makes it easier to manage transactions.
HY
Hyman
11 months ago
I think Truffle-Contract is overkill for simple projects.
GO
Goldie
11 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the roles of Truffle-Contract and Web3.js. One's a framework, right? But I can't recall the exact differences.
RE
Reita
11 months ago
I think I saw a practice question that mentioned how Truffle-Contract can help manage transactions better, especially since Web3.js is still in beta.
TA
Tasia
11 months ago
I remember reading that Truffle-Contract simplifies interactions with smart contracts, but I'm not sure if it's essential for every developer.
HO
Howard
12 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option A is not correct. Web3.js may change often, but that doesn't mean Truffle-Contract is a must for every developer. I'll steer clear of that one and focus on the key differences between the two.
PA
Paul
12 months ago
Option B sounds like the best approach to me. Truffle-Contract can simplify working with Web3.js, especially since Web3.js is still in beta. I'll highlight how Truffle-Contract's promise-based transactions can be more convenient.
KA
Kasandra
12 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer here. Truffle-Contract and Web3.js are quite different - one is a framework and the other is a library. I'll focus on explaining that distinction in my response.
JA
Janine
1 year ago
I'm not too familiar with the differences between Truffle-Contract and Web3.js, so I'll need to review the key features of each before deciding how to approach this question.
CA
Catalina
7 months ago
Yeah, knowing both is essential for developers.
KA
Kanisha
7 months ago
They serve different purposes, though.
MO
Moon
7 months ago
But isn't Web3.js more flexible?
MY
My
8 months ago
True, especially with promises!
CH
Chi
8 months ago
I think Truffle-Contract simplifies things a lot.