MENU
Externally Owned Accounts:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CBDE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
DE
Detra
10 months ago
Totally agree with B, private keys are essential!
BO
Bobbye
10 months ago
Wait, can you really destroy an account like that? Sounds risky!
MA
Maurine
10 months ago
C is misleading, they're not opcodes like contracts.
SI
Silvana
10 months ago
B is definitely true, can't send without the private key!
BR
Brianne
11 months ago
A is correct! Selfdestruct really sends the ether.
RU
Ruth
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question about ether transfers and selfdestruct, and I feel like A could be misleading in some cases.
DO
Dominque
12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about opcodes, but I don't think externally owned accounts are the same as smart contracts like option C suggests.
SH
Shasta
12 months ago
I remember studying that externally owned accounts are tied to private keys, so option B seems correct to me.
GL
Glory
12 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if selfdestruct really sends ether regardless of the fallback function.
HA
Hannah
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Aren't externally owned accounts the ones that can be destroyed using the selfdestruct keyword? I'm not sure if option A or B is correct. I'll have to review the material again before deciding.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. Externally owned accounts are associated with private keys, not smart contract logic. So option B seems to be the right answer here. I'll double-check my understanding, but I think I've got this.
AI
Aileen
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between externally owned accounts and smart contracts. I'll have to think this through carefully before answering.
KE
Kenia
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding that externally owned accounts are controlled by private keys, not smart contracts. So option B is the correct answer.
ZA
Zana
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C is also a possibility. Externally Owned Accounts are logical opcodes running on the ethereum blockchain.
BE
Beata
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A. Externally Owned Accounts can be destroyed using the selfdestruct keyword.
DE
Delfina
1 year ago
Sending all your ether to a random address? That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's stick with option B, shall we?
IL
Ilene
10 months ago
Agreed! Can't risk losing everything.
TI
Titus
10 months ago
Option B is definitely the safest choice.
HA
Haydee
11 months ago
Yeah, private keys are crucial.
SO
Soledad
11 months ago
Bold move indeed! Better to play it safe.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
C is just plain wrong. Externally Owned Accounts are not logical opcodes, they're the basic building blocks of the Ethereum network.
ME
Merlyn
1 year ago
Haha, selfdestruct? That's like blowing up your own house to get rid of the neighbors. Option B is the way to go.
AL
Aleisha
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. Externally Owned Accounts are bound to a private key.
SK
Skye
1 year ago
Option B is the correct answer. Externally Owned Accounts are bound to a private key, which is necessary to sign transactions going out of that account.