New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain CBDE Exam - Topic 3 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 116
Topic #: 3
[All CBDE Questions]

Externally Owned Accounts:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Tien at Jul 31, 2025, 01:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Detra
2 months ago
Totally agree with B, private keys are essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
2 months ago
Wait, can you really destroy an account like that? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
2 months ago
C is misleading, they're not opcodes like contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
2 months ago
B is definitely true, can't send without the private key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
3 months ago
A is correct! Selfdestruct really sends the ether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question about ether transfers and selfdestruct, and I feel like A could be misleading in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
4 months ago
I vaguely recall something about opcodes, but I don't think externally owned accounts are the same as smart contracts like option C suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
4 months ago
I remember studying that externally owned accounts are tied to private keys, so option B seems correct to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if selfdestruct really sends ether regardless of the fallback function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
4 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Aren't externally owned accounts the ones that can be destroyed using the selfdestruct keyword? I'm not sure if option A or B is correct. I'll have to review the material again before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. Externally owned accounts are associated with private keys, not smart contract logic. So option B seems to be the right answer here. I'll double-check my understanding, but I think I've got this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between externally owned accounts and smart contracts. I'll have to think this through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding that externally owned accounts are controlled by private keys, not smart contracts. So option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C is also a possibility. Externally Owned Accounts are logical opcodes running on the ethereum blockchain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A. Externally Owned Accounts can be destroyed using the selfdestruct keyword.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
6 months ago
Sending all your ether to a random address? That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's stick with option B, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
3 months ago
Agreed! Can't risk losing everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
3 months ago
Yeah, private keys are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
3 months ago
Bold move indeed! Better to play it safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
7 months ago
C is just plain wrong. Externally Owned Accounts are not logical opcodes, they're the basic building blocks of the Ethereum network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
7 months ago
Haha, selfdestruct? That's like blowing up your own house to get rid of the neighbors. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
7 months ago
I think the answer is B. Externally Owned Accounts are bound to a private key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
7 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. Externally Owned Accounts are bound to a private key, which is necessary to sign transactions going out of that account.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel