Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 2
[All CBDE Questions]

When considering smart contracts and the blockchain it's good:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Minna at Apr 25, 2024, 09:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Audry
20 days ago
B all the way. I don't want to be the one trying to debug a blockchain-powered grocery list, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
27 days ago
Alright, who's the comedian that suggested option A? That's just asking for trouble, like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
upvoted 0 times
Dan
1 days ago
Loise: Definitely, we don't want to overcomplicate things by moving everything to the blockchain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
16 days ago
User 2: I agree, keeping it simple and only using the blockchain when necessary makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
20 days ago
User 1: Option B seems like the most practical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
1 months ago
Whoa, option A? Are we trying to create a blockchain monster here? No thank you, I'll take B and keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
Marti
20 days ago
Herminia: Exactly, no need to complicate things by moving everything onto the blockchain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
21 days ago
User 2: Yeah, keeping it simple with just the necessary parts on the blockchain makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
27 days ago
User 1: I agree, option B seems more practical and less overwhelming.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
1 months ago
C seems like the sweet spot to me. Keep the Ether transfers on the blockchain, but let the rest live in a traditional system. Best of both worlds!
upvoted 0 times
Lenita
28 days ago
But wouldn't it be more secure to have everything on the same system?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 months ago
I agree, keeping only the Ether transfers on the blockchain makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yoko
2 months ago
Definitely B. Why complicate things when you can just put the critical stuff on the blockchain and keep the rest in a regular database? Efficiency, people!
upvoted 0 times
Carol
29 days ago
I think it's important to carefully consider what really needs to be on the blockchain to avoid unnecessary complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
1 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple is key. Plus, it makes it easier for others to understand the smart contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beth
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Putting everything on the blockchain just sounds like a headache waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
Yen
28 days ago
Yeah, option B seems like the most practical choice for smart contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
1 months ago
Option C seems like a good compromise, focusing on value-transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 months ago
I think option A could work too, but it might be too much to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple with option B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 months ago
I see both sides, but I lean towards option C. Keeping only Ether transfers on the blockchain seems like a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is better. Having everything on the same system makes it easier to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
2 months ago
I think option B is the best approach. We shouldn't overcrowd the blockchain with unnecessary logic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel