I'm pretty confident that option A is not correct. Web3.js may change often, but that doesn't mean Truffle-Contract is a must for every developer. I'll steer clear of that one and focus on the key differences between the two.
Option B sounds like the best approach to me. Truffle-Contract can simplify working with Web3.js, especially since Web3.js is still in beta. I'll highlight how Truffle-Contract's promise-based transactions can be more convenient.
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer here. Truffle-Contract and Web3.js are quite different - one is a framework and the other is a library. I'll focus on explaining that distinction in my response.
I'm not too familiar with the differences between Truffle-Contract and Web3.js, so I'll need to review the key features of each before deciding how to approach this question.
Dahlia
22 days agoCammy
27 days agoAlison
1 month agoKindra
1 month agoJesus
1 month agoRaylene
2 months agoLoren
2 months agoNichelle
2 months agoWinfred
2 months agoTawanna
2 months agoMelissia
2 months agoAntione
3 months agoChristiane
3 months agoHyman
3 months agoGoldie
3 months agoReita
3 months agoTasia
4 months agoHoward
4 months agoPaul
4 months agoKasandra
4 months agoJanine
4 months agoMy
12 days agoChi
17 days ago