BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam

Question #: 67
Topic #: 4

An unforeseen geopolitical risk impacts a program to establish a company's operations abroad. Stakeholders now want to establish a risk response team to define a mitigation plan. Ultimately what appeared to be a significant risk resulted in a negligible risk.

What should the program manager recommend to stakeholders for future similar situations?

AAccept the risk

BSeek an expert opinion

CEstablish an on-call risk response team

DReview the risk severity matrix

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Jaleesa at Mar 04, 2026, 08:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14.1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Magdalene

3 days ago

I agree, but establishing an on-call risk response team could be more proactive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Soledad

8 days ago

I think seeking an expert opinion is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

14 days ago

D) Review the risk severity matrix makes sense. Understanding risks better helps future planning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebeca

19 days ago

A) Accept the risk seems risky. We need to be proactive, not reactive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

24 days ago

I prefer C) Establish an on-call risk response team. Quick responses are crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

29 days ago

I think B) Seek an expert opinion is best. Experts can provide insights.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalie

1 month ago

D makes sense. Reviewing the matrix helps understand severity better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

1 month ago

A could work too. Sometimes you just have to accept it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 month ago

I prefer C. An on-call team can respond quickly next time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

2 months ago

I think B is a good choice. Expert opinions can clarify risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Major

2 months ago

D) Review the risk severity matrix sounds smart. We need to learn from this!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

2 months ago

A) Accept the risk could work, but only if we have a solid plan in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

4 months ago

Wait, how did they misjudge the risk so badly? Seems fishy to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

4 months ago

I think C) Establish an on-call risk response team is the way to go. Better safe than sorry!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hui

4 months ago

Definitely B) Seek an expert opinion. Can't hurt to get a second opinion!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bev

4 months ago

D) Review the risk severity matrix is a must. Can't overlook the basics!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmett

4 months ago

Totally agree with A) Accept the risk. Sometimes you just have to roll with it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

4 months ago

Wait, how did they misjudge the risk so badly? Sounds fishy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

5 months ago

I think C) Establish an on-call risk response team makes sense. Better to be prepared!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

5 months ago

Definitely B) Seek an expert opinion. Always good to have insights!

upvoted 0 times

...

Edda

5 months ago

I'm a bit torn between accepting the risk and establishing a risk response team. It seems like both could be valid depending on the context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

5 months ago

I feel like reviewing the risk severity matrix could provide valuable insights for future risks. It might help in understanding how to categorize them better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wei

5 months ago

I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I leaned towards seeking expert opinions. It could help clarify the situation better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

5 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of having a risk response team in our last class. It seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...