BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam

Question #: 33
Topic #: 1

Using a vertical cable support structure can create issues for the cable attached to the pathway Several issues can result It the support work is not clone correctly. Which two of the following conditions could be caused by a poorly supported cabled (Select two options.)

ALower dB loss values

BStretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands

CIncreased Interference levels

DReduced expected useful life and performance

ESlippage between the cable core and the sheath

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lavonda at Jun 24, 2024, 06:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14.1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Gladys

10 months ago

Slippage? E sounds like a stretch, not sure about that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

10 months ago

C is a big issue too, can't have interference messing with signals!

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

11 months ago

Wait, are we really saying lower dB loss is a possibility? That sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgie

11 months ago

I agree with B, but D seems a bit extreme.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

11 months ago

Definitely B and D! Poor support can really mess things up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

11 months ago

I vaguely recall that slippage could be an issue, but I’m leaning more towards D for the reduced performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maile

12 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think B is definitely one of the answers, but I'm torn between D and E for the second option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

12 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like increased interference could also be a problem, so maybe C is a contender too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

12 months ago

I remember discussing how improper support can lead to physical damage, so I think B and D might be the right choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

12 months ago

This question is really testing our understanding of cable support structures and the potential consequences of poor installation. I think I've got a good handle on it, but I'll review my notes just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

12 months ago

Increased interference levels and reduced expected useful life and performance seem like the two most likely options to me. I'll focus on those as my answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

12 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the "lower dB loss values" option. Wouldn't a poorly supported cable actually lead to higher dB loss? I'll need to double-check that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carylon

12 months ago

Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure that stretching of the copper conductors and breakage of the optical fiber strands is one of the possible issues. That makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

1 year ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the potential issues that could arise from a poorly supported cable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

1 year ago

Alright, I've got a strategy. I'll start by identifying the key information in the code, like the package statements and class names. Then I'll evaluate each answer option and see which one best matches the given scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

1 year ago

This seems like a straightforward question about project management processes. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes the process of confirming acceptance criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

1 year ago

Okay, let me see. A load balancer distributes incoming traffic across multiple servers, so I'm going to go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

1 year ago

Alright, time to put my Cisco SD-WAN knowledge to the test. I'll carefully analyze each policy option and consider how the network topology and traffic requirements factor in. Gotta make sure I select the right solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daisy

1 year ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key concepts before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aron

1 year ago

Slippage between the cable core and the sheath? Sounds like a fashion disaster waiting to happen. Maybe we should start a cable modeling agency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

1 year ago

Reduced expected useful life and performance? That's the cable version of a midlife crisis. Looks like it's time for an upgrade!

upvoted 0 times

Whitley

1 year ago

A: Slippage between the cable core and the sheath

upvoted 0 times

...

Vesta

1 year ago

B: Reduced expected useful life and performance

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlen

1 year ago

A: Stretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands

upvoted 0 times

...

Mollie

1 year ago

Increased interference levels? Guess the cable is trying to get in on the radio business. But hey, at least it'll be the life of the party, right?

upvoted 0 times

Reena

1 year ago

B) Stretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

1 year ago

A) Lower dB loss values

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

1 year ago

Well, well, well, look at that. Stretching copper conductors and breaking optical fibers? Sounds like a fun party trick, but not exactly what I want in my network cables.

upvoted 0 times

Armando

1 year ago

D: Definitely, we need to make sure the support work is done correctly to prevent any potential problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmela

1 year ago

C: I agree, it's important to ensure proper support for the cables to avoid any issues like that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janae

1 year ago

B: Absolutely, that could lead to reduced performance and a shorter useful life for the cables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

1 year ago

A: Yeah, that does not sound good at all. We definitely don't want any stretching or breakage in our cables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

1 year ago

Seriously? Lower dB loss values? That's like saying I can lose weight by eating more junk food. Clearly, B and D are the correct answers here.

upvoted 0 times

Elenor

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, I agree. B and D seem more logical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

1 year ago

User 1: Lower dB loss values? That doesn't make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

2 years ago

I believe increased interference levels could also be caused by a poorly supported cable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

2 years ago

I agree with Lonny. I also think it could lead to slippage between the cable core and the sheath.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

2 years ago

I think the poorly supported cable could cause stretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands.

upvoted 0 times

...