New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All RCDDv14.1 Questions]

Using a vertical cable support structure can create issues for the cable attached to the pathway Several issues can result It the support work is not clone correctly. Which two of the following conditions could be caused by a poorly supported cabled (Select two options.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lavonda at Jun 24, 2024, 06:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14.1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gladys
3 months ago
Slippage? E sounds like a stretch, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
3 months ago
C is a big issue too, can't have interference messing with signals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
3 months ago
Wait, are we really saying lower dB loss is a possibility? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
4 months ago
I agree with B, but D seems a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
4 months ago
Definitely B and D! Poor support can really mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that slippage could be an issue, but I’m leaning more towards D for the reduced performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think B is definitely one of the answers, but I'm torn between D and E for the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like increased interference could also be a problem, so maybe C is a contender too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
5 months ago
I remember discussing how improper support can lead to physical damage, so I think B and D might be the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
5 months ago
This question is really testing our understanding of cable support structures and the potential consequences of poor installation. I think I've got a good handle on it, but I'll review my notes just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
5 months ago
Increased interference levels and reduced expected useful life and performance seem like the two most likely options to me. I'll focus on those as my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the "lower dB loss values" option. Wouldn't a poorly supported cable actually lead to higher dB loss? I'll need to double-check that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure that stretching of the copper conductors and breakage of the optical fiber strands is one of the possible issues. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the potential issues that could arise from a poorly supported cable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
5 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy. I'll start by identifying the key information in the code, like the package statements and class names. Then I'll evaluate each answer option and see which one best matches the given scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about project management processes. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes the process of confirming acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. A load balancer distributes incoming traffic across multiple servers, so I'm going to go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
5 months ago
Alright, time to put my Cisco SD-WAN knowledge to the test. I'll carefully analyze each policy option and consider how the network topology and traffic requirements factor in. Gotta make sure I select the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key concepts before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
9 months ago
Slippage between the cable core and the sheath? Sounds like a fashion disaster waiting to happen. Maybe we should start a cable modeling agency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
9 months ago
Reduced expected useful life and performance? That's the cable version of a midlife crisis. Looks like it's time for an upgrade!
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
8 months ago
A: Slippage between the cable core and the sheath
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
9 months ago
B: Reduced expected useful life and performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
9 months ago
A: Stretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mollie
10 months ago
Increased interference levels? Guess the cable is trying to get in on the radio business. But hey, at least it'll be the life of the party, right?
upvoted 0 times
Reena
9 months ago
B) Stretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
9 months ago
A) Lower dB loss values
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
10 months ago
Well, well, well, look at that. Stretching copper conductors and breaking optical fibers? Sounds like a fun party trick, but not exactly what I want in my network cables.
upvoted 0 times
Armando
8 months ago
D: Definitely, we need to make sure the support work is done correctly to prevent any potential problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
8 months ago
C: I agree, it's important to ensure proper support for the cables to avoid any issues like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
9 months ago
B: Absolutely, that could lead to reduced performance and a shorter useful life for the cables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
10 months ago
A: Yeah, that does not sound good at all. We definitely don't want any stretching or breakage in our cables.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juan
10 months ago
Seriously? Lower dB loss values? That's like saying I can lose weight by eating more junk food. Clearly, B and D are the correct answers here.
upvoted 0 times
Elenor
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. B and D seem more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
10 months ago
User 1: Lower dB loss values? That doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antione
11 months ago
I believe increased interference levels could also be caused by a poorly supported cable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
11 months ago
I agree with Lonny. I also think it could lead to slippage between the cable core and the sheath.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
11 months ago
I think the poorly supported cable could cause stretching of copper conductors and breakage of optical fiber strands.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel