BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam

Question #: 25
Topic #: 1

A program manager is responsible for constructing a USS50 million building Management suggests it will take three years to complete The program manager can select a design-build option to optimize the construction schedule to 1 5 years However heavy demand for steel is causing price increases and delivery delays. II this trend continues, it could take as long as 4.5 years to complete construction. You learn that a new technology can yield a definitive delivery schedule of 1 25 years

What is the expected time of delivery?

A1.25 years

B1 50 years

C175 years

D1 00 years

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lauran at Mar 09, 2024, 02:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14.1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lai

3 months ago

I think 1.5 years is more realistic considering the current market.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

3 months ago

Totally agree, 1.25 years is the best option here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

3 months ago

1.25 years? Really? That seems too good to be true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

4 months ago

But what about those steel delays? Could push it longer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

4 months ago

The new tech says 1.25 years, sounds promising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

4 months ago

I feel like I might have seen a question like this before, and I think the answer was leaning towards the 1.5 years option, but I’m not confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about how the heavy demand for steel impacts the final decision. Does it mean we should stick with the new technology?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pansy

4 months ago

This seems similar to a practice question where we had to evaluate risks in construction timelines. I think the 1.25 years option looks promising.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how to weigh different delivery options in class, but I'm not entirely sure if the new technology guarantees the shortest time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Niesha

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is A, 1.25 years. The question clearly states that the new technology can yield a definitive delivery schedule of 1.25 years, so that should be the expected time of delivery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The original construction time is 3 years, but the design-build option can optimize it to 1.5 years. However, the steel delays could extend it to 4.5 years. But then the question states that a new technology can deliver it in 1.25 years, so that should be the expected time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matilda

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions that the program manager can select a design-build option to optimize the construction schedule to 1.5 years, but then it also says that heavy demand for steel could cause delays up to 4.5 years. I'm not sure which one to go with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

5 months ago

This seems straightforward - the question states that the new technology can yield a definitive delivery schedule of 1.25 years, so that should be the expected time of delivery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blythe

5 months ago

The key here is avoiding cloud provider lock-in, so I'm leaning towards IBM Cloud Pak for Applications. It seems to offer the flexibility and portability we're looking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thomasena

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that an architecture pattern is a way to describe the interfaces between building blocks, so I'll go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tricia

5 months ago

I'm a little confused by the different options here. The $substr option doesn't seem right, since we're working with an array, not a string. And the options that just list the array elements directly don't seem like the right approach either. I think I need to focus on the $slice operator, but I'm not 100% sure I have the syntax correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

5 months ago

This looks like a tricky BIND-related question. I'll need to think carefully about the different rdnc sub commands and how they interact with zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

10 months ago

1 year? That's gotta be a typo, right? Even with the new technology, I can't imagine they can pull that off. Unless the program manager is some kind of construction wizard, I'm going with 1.25 years.

upvoted 0 times

Amie

8 months ago

D) 1.00 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Julianna

8 months ago

C) 1.75 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

8 months ago

B) 1.50 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

8 months ago

A) 1.25 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

10 months ago

Hmm, 1.50 years seems like a reasonable compromise. Not too rushed, but still faster than the original timeline. As long as the quality is up to par, I'd say that's the best option.

upvoted 0 times

Jarod

9 months ago

C) 1.75 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

9 months ago

B) 1.50 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Leila

9 months ago

A) 1.25 years

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

10 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think the answer is A) 1.25 years because it's the shortest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phuong

11 months ago

1.75 years? That's a bit too long if you ask me. With the new technology, 1.25 years is the way to go. I bet the program manager can get a bonus for finishing so quickly!

upvoted 0 times