Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS Exam TAE Topic 5 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TAE exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 5
[All TAE Questions]

You have been asked to automate a set of functional tests at system Test level via the CLI of the SUT for the first release of a software system. The automated tests will be delivered to the learn in change of maintenance testing, who will use them for part of the regression testing. They have the following requirements.

1. The automated tests must be as fast and cheap to maintain as possible

2. The cost of adding new automated tests must be as low as possible

3. The automated tests must have a high level of independence from the tool itself

Which of the following scripting techniques would be MOST suitable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Maricela at Jul 14, 2024, 03:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tyisha
7 days ago
Structured scripting might work, but it sounds like it could be a bit overkill for this use case. Unless you're dealing with a super complex system, I think the other options might be a better fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
16 days ago
Haha, linear scripting? What is this, the 90s? That's just asking for trouble. You'd have to update the entire script every time the system changes. No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
23 days ago
Keyword-driven scripting could also be a good option. It gives us the flexibility to add new tests with minimal effort, and the maintenance costs should be relatively low. I'm curious to hear what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
Marisha
2 days ago
I agree, Keyword-driven scripting seems like the most suitable option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
9 days ago
I think Keyword-driven scripting would be the best choice. It meets all the requirements and allows for easy maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
26 days ago
Data-driven scripting seems like the way to go here. It'll allow us to easily maintain and update the tests as the system evolves, without having to re-write the entire script. Plus, the independence from the tool itself is a big plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
29 days ago
I prefer data-driven scripting. It provides independence from the tool itself and is also cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
30 days ago
I agree with Dominque. Keyword-driven scripting allows for easy maintenance and low cost of adding new tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
1 months ago
I think keyword-driven scripting would be the most suitable option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel