Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam TAE Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TAE exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 3
[All TAE Questions]

Consider A TAS for testing a desktop application via its GUI. All the test cases of the automated test suite contain the same identical sequences of steps at the beginning (to create the necessary objects when doing a preliminary configuration of the test environment and at the end (to remove everything created --specifically for the test itself during the preliminary configuration of the test environment). All automated test cases use the same set of assertion functions from a shared library, for verifying the values in the GUI fields ( e.g text boxes).

What is the BEST recommendation for improving the TAS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Victor
16 days ago
Is it just me, or does Option A sound a bit like a buzzword salad? Anyway, I agree with Katheryn - Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
1 days ago
Option A does sound a bit buzzwordy, but I think it could really help with improving the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Holley
18 days ago
Ha! Imagine if the developers just used a random number generator to decide which fields to test. That would be hilarious, but probably not the best approach. I'd go with Option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
21 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B about improving the application's testability seems interesting, but it might be overkill for this scenario. Let's see what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
27 days ago
I think Option C is the way to go. Adopting a set of standard verification methods for all the automated tests would ensure consistency and make it easier to maintain the test suite.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
3 days ago
B) Improving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
7 days ago
A) Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francene
1 months ago
I personally think adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests would be more beneficial in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 months ago
I agree with Lenna. It would make the test suite more maintainable and reusable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
I think implementing keywords with higher level of granularity would be the best recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward solution. Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at the test case level would help reduce code duplication and make the tests more maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
C) Adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
1 days ago
B) Improving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
2 days ago
A) Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
5 days ago
D) Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
7 days ago
C) Adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
9 days ago
B) Improving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
21 days ago
A) Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel