MENU
A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been added to the automated regression test suite.
Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
AM
Amira
11 months ago
D could definitely lead to issues down the line.
LA
Lauryn
11 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure the tests cover everything?
MA
Marisha
11 months ago
B seems like a big risk if archives aren't synced.
DE
Desmond
11 months ago
I think C is spot on! Consistency is key.
EV
Eve
11 months ago
Automated tests can miss edge cases.
AN
Anglea
12 months ago
D seems a bit off to me; I thought the scope of the test suite shouldn't affect the defect's recurrence directly.
AR
Arletta
12 months ago
C sounds plausible too, but I feel like it depends on how often the regression suite is actually executed.
RA
Raina
1 year ago
I think B could be a strong contender since poor configuration management can lead to issues in future releases.
NI
Nickolas
1 year ago
I remember discussing how automated tests might not catch everything, but I'm not sure if that's what A is getting at.
HU
Hui
1 year ago
Option C seems most likely to me. If the regression suite isn't consistently run, that could definitely lead to the defect resurfacing.
MI
Mireya
1 year ago
I think the answer is A - the automated defect confirmation testing may not be enough to ensure the fix will hold up in future releases.
DA
Daren
1 year ago
Hmm, the options all seem plausible. I'll need to carefully consider the implications of each one.
CO
Corrina
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points before answering.
JU
Julian
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the Poisson and Exponential distributions. They both deal with discrete events, right? I'll have to review those concepts before answering this one.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the options and the error message before making a decision.
KA
Kattie
2 years ago
It could be a factor, if the tests are not being run regularly then issues might not be caught.
AR
Ariel
2 years ago
Do you think the automated regression test suite not being run consistently is a reason for the defect re-occurring?
TR
Truman
2 years ago
That's a good point, if the process is not in place, the defect could slip through again.
KA
Kattie
2 years ago
What about the configuration management process not properly controlling synchronization between software archives?
AR
Ariel
2 years ago
I agree with Truman, if the testing doesn't confirm the defect will work in future releases, it could happen again.
TR
Truman
2 years ago
I think the defect could re-occur if the automated defect confirmation testing is not effective.