Haha, option D is like building a car with duct tape and chewing gum. The TAS should definitely have components that can be easily replaced, but 'without affecting the overall behavior'? That's asking a bit much!
Absolutely, option B is the way to go. The TAS needs to be under configuration management along with the entire test infrastructure. Maintaining traceability is crucial.
Option A is a bit off. The TAS should be runnable in the development environment, but it doesn't have to be there because of that. Programming knowledge is important, but not a strict requirement for maintainability.
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) The TAS must consist of components that can be easily replaced without affecting the overall behavior of the TAS itself.
I think the answer is A) The TAS must run in the development environment because development and programming knowledge are required for its maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Craig
15 days agoVerda
22 days agoJoni
27 days agoGilma
28 days agoAja
1 days agoGlennis
7 days agoOna
1 months agoPhung
2 months agoVi
2 months agoPhung
2 months ago