Haha, option D is like building a car with duct tape and chewing gum. The TAS should definitely have components that can be easily replaced, but 'without affecting the overall behavior'? That's asking a bit much!
Absolutely, option B is the way to go. The TAS needs to be under configuration management along with the entire test infrastructure. Maintaining traceability is crucial.
Option A is a bit off. The TAS should be runnable in the development environment, but it doesn't have to be there because of that. Programming knowledge is important, but not a strict requirement for maintainability.
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) The TAS must consist of components that can be easily replaced without affecting the overall behavior of the TAS itself.
I think the answer is A) The TAS must run in the development environment because development and programming knowledge are required for its maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Craig
3 months agoHillary
1 months agoJose
1 months agoMaryrose
2 months agoSherita
2 months agoVerda
3 months agoCatalina
2 months agoSharen
2 months agoLaurel
2 months agoJoni
3 months agoGilma
3 months agoCharolette
2 months agoAja
3 months agoGlennis
3 months agoOna
4 months agoSue
2 months agoRolande
2 months agoFernanda
2 months agoJanessa
2 months agoPhung
4 months agoVi
5 months agoPhung
5 months ago