Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS Exam PDP9 Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's PDP9 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All PDP9 Questions]

Which of the following is NOT a processor obligation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The definitions of ''public authority'' and ''public body'' for the purposes of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 are found in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 2018 respectively. Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 2018 provides that a public authority or a public body is one that is listed in Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or is designated by an order under section 5 of that Act. However, a court or tribunal acting in its judicial capacity is not considered a public authority or a public body under the Data Protection Act 2018.Reference:

Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 20181

Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000


by Marguerita at Mar 05, 2024, 12:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PDP9 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Annett
16 days ago
Wait, so the processor has to be a mind reader and know what the controller is thinking? This exam is getting a bit too 'out there' for my liking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
18 days ago
I'm going with D. The processor is definitely obligated to inform the controller about any intended changes to other processors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 months ago
Haha, this exam is like a game of 'Spot the Odd One Out'. C is definitely the most random option here.
upvoted 0 times
Carlene
8 days ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
19 days ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
1 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The processor doesn't need to consult the controller before appointing other processors, as long as they inform the controller about any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it might be B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 months ago
Option C seems a bit out of place here. Why would a processor need to provide the controller with corporate information about its board members?
upvoted 0 times
Leota
20 days ago
D) To inform the controller of any intended changes of other processors so they can object
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
27 days ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
1 months ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meaghan
2 months ago
I agree with Tasia. The processor's obligation is not to provide corporate information about its board members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) To provide the controller with corporate information relating to its board members.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel