MENU
Which of the following is NOT a processor obligation?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium PDP9 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The definitions of ''public authority'' and ''public body'' for the purposes of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 are found in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 2018 respectively. Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 2018 provides that a public authority or a public body is one that is listed in Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or is designated by an order under section 5 of that Act. However, a court or tribunal acting in its judicial capacity is not considered a public authority or a public body under the Data Protection Act 2018.Reference:
Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 20181
Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000
37 comments · newest first
TR
Trinidad
11 months ago
Wait, do processors really have to share board member info? That sounds weird.
CH
Chantay
11 months ago
Totally agree with B being not a processor obligation!
DA
Daryl
11 months ago
C seems unnecessary for processors, right?
AU
Audra
11 months ago
I think B is the odd one out here.
TA
Tawna
11 months ago
A is definitely a processor obligation.
RH
Rhea
12 months ago
I definitely recall that processors need to inform controllers about changes, so D seems like an obligation. C feels off, but I’m not 100% confident.
HA
Harris
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B could be a trick option. It sounds like something they might need to do, but I can't recall clearly.
CI
Ciara
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about processor obligations, and I’m pretty sure they have to follow the controller’s instructions, so A doesn’t seem like the answer.
CO
Corazon
1 year ago
I think option C might be the right answer since it seems unrelated to processing obligations.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
I think the key is to focus on the wording "NOT a processor obligation." That means I need to find the one responsibility that doesn't fit with the others. I'll carefully consider each option.
JO
Jodi
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The processor's main job is to follow the controller's instructions, so option A is definitely an obligation. I'll mark that one as the correct answer.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the key processor responsibilities to determine which one is not an obligation.
SA
Samuel
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and eliminate the ones that are clearly processor obligations.
CA
Carmen
1 year ago
Wait, I'm confused. Aren't processors also supposed to consult the controller before appointing other processors? I'm not sure if that's the right answer here.
SH
Shawn
1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got it! The options cover the typical steps, but one of them is not actually part of the decision-making process. I'll need to analyze each option closely to identify the odd one out.
SY
Sylvia
1 year ago
I'm not too sure about this one. The options seem to be talking about different types of desktops and applications, but I'm not sure how they relate to a SQL Server outage.
SV
Svetlana
1 year ago
I've got this! Option A is definitely true - Financial Management will validate the member list. And option D is also correct, you can create member lists in EPMA. I'm confident those are the two right answers.
AN
Annett
1 year ago
Wait, so the processor has to be a mind reader and know what the controller is thinking? This exam is getting a bit too 'out there' for my liking.
AN
Annelle
1 year ago
I'm going with D. The processor is definitely obligated to inform the controller about any intended changes to other processors.
JA
Jackie
1 year ago
C) To provide the controller with corporate information relating to its board members.
TI
Tiera
1 year ago
C) To provide the controller with corporate information relating to its board members.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
RE
Refugia
1 year ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
VE
Veronique
1 year ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
FL
Floyd
1 year ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
Haha, this exam is like a game of 'Spot the Odd One Out'. C is definitely the most random option here.
RO
Rolf
1 year ago
D) To inform the controller of any intended changes of other processors so they can object
CA
Carlene
1 year ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
SH
Shala
1 year ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
ST
Stevie
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. The processor doesn't need to consult the controller before appointing other processors, as long as they inform the controller about any changes.
LA
Lavina
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it might be B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
AL
Alyce
2 years ago
Option C seems a bit out of place here. Why would a processor need to provide the controller with corporate information about its board members?
LE
Leota
1 year ago
D) To inform the controller of any intended changes of other processors so they can object
DO
Donette
1 year ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
RE
Reyes
1 year ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
ME
Meaghan
2 years ago
I agree with Tasia. The processor's obligation is not to provide corporate information about its board members.
TA
Tasia
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) To provide the controller with corporate information relating to its board members.