MENU
For the same financial institution in Question 12, with the same requirements and expectations, what would be the most likely investment values used in testing if two-point boundary value analysis is used to design test cases specific to the 13% interest rate equivalence partition?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CTFL4 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The state transition diagram provided shows three distinct states:
Waiting for fingerprint
Waiting for PIN
Valid PIN/ask menu selection
Each state represents a different stage in the system's operation, with transitions based on user actions and system responses.
33 comments · newest first
LA
Lavera
11 months ago
I thought it would be A, more values to test the limits!
GL
Glen
11 months ago
C looks too simple, not enough values for testing.
JA
Janey
11 months ago
Wait, why would we use R99 999? Seems off.
LE
Leah
12 months ago
I agree, B seems right for the edge cases.
ME
Meaghan
12 months ago
Definitely think it's B, those boundaries make sense.
MA
Marilynn
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should consider values just above R500 000. I thought we only needed the exact limits for testing.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the two-point boundary values should definitely include the exact limits.
GE
Genevive
1 year ago
I think option B looks familiar since it includes values right around the boundaries, like R100 000 and R499 999.
RA
Ranee
1 year ago
I remember we discussed boundary value analysis, but I'm not sure if we should include values just below and above the thresholds.
DA
Dallas
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording of the question is a bit confusing to me. I'll need to take some time to really understand the concepts of equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis before I can confidently answer this. Better to be thorough than guess.
SO
Soledad
1 year ago
I've got this! The most likely investment values would be R99,999, R100,000, R499,999, and R500,000. Those represent the lower and upper boundaries of the 13% interest rate equivalence partition, using two-point boundary value analysis. Easy peasy!
JU
Juan
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. We need to find the investment values that would be used in testing for the 13% interest rate equivalence partition, using two-point boundary value analysis. I'll need to review my notes on that technique to make sure I approach this properly.
LI
Lizbeth
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. The key seems to be the 13% interest rate equivalence partition and using two-point boundary value analysis.
RO
Rolf
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit confused about how to apply two-point boundary value analysis here. I'll need to carefully re-read the question and think through the logic. Maybe I can find some examples in my study materials to help guide me.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between material requirements planning and master production scheduling. I'll need to review those concepts before answering.
LA
Lashawnda
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is the Playbook running on Prism Element or Prism Central? That's going to determine where I need to look for the issue.
LE
Lewis
1 year ago
In this exam, the correct answer is hidden behind a paywall. You have to pay extra to unlock it. It's called the 'Financial Transparency DLC'.
GE
Gene
1 year ago
Ah, the joys of financial testing! Where every penny counts and the boundaries are as elusive as a unicorn. I'm going with D, just for the sheer audacity of it.
BR
Brice
1 year ago
I agree, B seems like a solid choice for testing the 13% interest rate equivalence partition.
LA
Lawrence
1 year ago
Hmm, I hadn't considered B. It does make sense for the boundaries. What do you think?
SE
Selma
1 year ago
Interesting, I see your point. But I believe B might be the safer bet for this scenario.
LE
Letha
1 year ago
I think D is a bold choice, but I'm leaning towards A for more coverage.
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! I feel like I need to dust off my old textbooks and relearn two-point boundary value analysis from scratch. Wish me luck!
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
Let's hope for the best outcome with our test cases!
MI
Mira
1 year ago
I agree, those values seem to fit the criteria for two-point boundary value analysis.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
Good luck! I think the answer might be B) R99 999, R100 000, R499 999, R500 000.
AN
Annice
2 years ago
I'm not sure about this one. Isn't two-point boundary value analysis all about testing the edges of the valid input range? If that's the case, then I'd say the answer is C.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's A. It includes values just above and below the boundaries.
OL
Ollie
1 year ago
I think it's B. It covers the lower and upper boundaries of the valid input range.
KA
Kattie
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. The boundaries for the 13% interest rate equivalence partition would be the values just below and just above the 100,000 and 500,000 marks.
GA
Gaston
2 years ago
But A includes all the values in the equivalence partition, so it covers all possibilities.
EM
Emiko
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
GA
Gaston
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.