Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS CISMP-V9 Exam - Topic 7 Question 78 Discussion

When a digital forensics investigator is conducting art investigation and handling the original data, what KEY principle must they adhere to?
A) Ensure they are competent to be able to do so and be able to justify their actions.
B) Ensure they are being observed by a senior investigator in all actions.
C) Ensure they do not handle the evidence as that must be done by law enforcement officers.
D) Ensure the data has been adjusted to meet the investigation requirements.

BCS CISMP-V9 Exam - Topic 7 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CISMP-V9 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 7
[All CISMP-V9 Questions]

When a digital forensics investigator is conducting art investigation and handling the original data, what KEY principle must they adhere to?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The key principle a digital forensics investigator must adhere to is ensuring competence and the ability to justify their actions. This is crucial because the integrity of the investigation and the evidence must be maintained. Competence ensures that the investigator has the necessary skills and knowledge to handle and analyze the data correctly. Being able to justify their actions is important for the legal process, as every step of the investigation may be scrutinized in court.This principle aligns with the Information Security Management Principles, which emphasize the importance of procedural/people security controls and technical security controls to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Information Security Management Principles1.


by Ezekiel at Jul 03, 2024, 02:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISMP-V9 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Novella
10 months ago
I thought only law enforcement could handle evidence, C might be true?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
10 months ago
B seems unnecessary, they should be trusted to work independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
10 months ago
Wait, can they really adjust the data? Sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
10 months ago
Totally agree, A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
11 months ago
Gotta be competent to justify actions, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
11 months ago
I definitely studied that we shouldn't adjust the data, but I can't remember if that's the key principle they’re asking about here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
11 months ago
I feel like the answer is related to being observed by a senior investigator, but I can't recall if that's a strict requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
11 months ago
I think it might be about ensuring proper handling of the original data, like not altering it. That sounds familiar from practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
11 months ago
I remember something about the importance of competence in handling evidence, but I'm not sure if that's the main principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
11 months ago
The best strategy is to focus on the core principle of maintaining the integrity of the original data. That should guide the investigator's actions throughout the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a couple times to make sure I understand exactly what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
11 months ago
The key here is ensuring the investigator is competent and can justify their actions. That's the most important principle to adhere to when handling original data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss any key details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
12 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about digital forensics principles. I'm pretty confident I know the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Based on the options, it looks like the vendor can respond to either a vendor tiering assessment or a vendor risk assessment. I'll go with vendor risk assessment since that's a more common type of vendor assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
12 months ago
I remember we discussed that merely offering a bribe, even if it doesn't happen, can still count as an offense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
12 months ago
Okay, this is a good question to test our understanding of agile implementation best practices. I think the key here is to identify the root causes of the failure and then determine the appropriate corrective actions. Let me carefully analyze each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
12 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on my understanding of Indian data privacy laws, the answer is B - companies that conduct cross-border data transfers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
2 years ago
Option B sounds like a great idea, but I'm pretty sure the senior investigator is there to supervise, not do the actual work. A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 years ago
I think both A) and C) are important. The investigator should be competent and follow proper procedures for evidence handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
2 years ago
I'm going with option A. Can't go wrong with ensuring competence and being able to justify your actions. Forensics is serious business, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Shay
2 years ago
Gussie: Absolutely, we can't take any chances when it comes to digital forensics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
2 years ago
It's important to have the skills and knowledge to handle such sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
2 years ago
Definitely, being able to justify your actions is crucial in handling original data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
2 years ago
I agree, option A is the way to go. Competence is key in digital forensics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 years ago
Definitely, being able to justify your actions is crucial in handling original data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
2 years ago
I agree, option A is the way to go. Competence is key in digital forensics.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
2 years ago
Haha, option D is a classic! Adjusting the data to 'meet the investigation requirements' - that's like tampering with evidence, right?
upvoted 0 times
Lili
2 years ago
Definitely, we have to be competent and justify our actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
2 years ago
Yeah, option D sounds shady. We can't tamper with evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hana
2 years ago
I believe option C) Ensure they do not handle the evidence as that must be done by law enforcement officers is also crucial to maintain the integrity of the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
2 years ago
I agree with Donette. It's important for the investigator to have the necessary skills and knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
2 years ago
Option A is definitely the correct answer. Handling the original data requires proper competence and justification of actions.
upvoted 0 times
Sage
2 years ago
Absolutely, it's crucial for a digital forensics investigator to be competent and able to justify their actions when handling original data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
2 years ago
Option A is definitely the correct answer. Handling the original data requires proper competence and justification of actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donette
2 years ago
I think the key principle is A) Ensure they are competent to be able to do so and be able to justify their actions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel