MENU
Which security concept provides redundancy in the event a security control failure or the exploitation of a vulnerability?
32 comments · newest first
MO
Mollie
11 months ago
"Sandboxing" is cool, but it doesn't really fit this question.
DA
Darrin
11 months ago
Wait, can "System Integrity" really provide redundancy? Not so sure.
JU
Junita
12 months ago
Yeah, "Defence in depth" is the way to go!
CE
Cecilia
12 months ago
I think "Intrusion Prevention System" is more relevant here.
SH
Shalon
1 year ago
Definitely "Defence in depth" for redundancy!
AN
Annalee
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think "defense in depth" was the answer there too. It just makes sense for redundancy!
AH
Ahmed
1 year ago
I feel like "intrusion prevention systems" are more about active monitoring rather than redundancy, but I could be wrong.
RO
Rosamond
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about redundancy being a key part of "defense in depth."
CA
Carline
1 year ago
I think "defense in depth" is the right answer since it emphasizes multiple layers of security.
MA
Man
1 year ago
I'm feeling a bit confused on this one. I know the concepts, but I'm not sure which one specifically provides redundancy in the event of a failure or vulnerability. I'll have to review my notes and think it through carefully before answering.
VI
Viva
1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. System Integrity is about ensuring the system hasn't been tampered with, Sandboxing is about isolating applications, and an Intrusion Prevention System is a specific security tool. I think Defense in Depth is the best answer, since it's the broader concept of having multiple overlapping security measures.
GL
Glen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Defense in Depth is about having multiple layers of security controls, but I'm not sure if that's the exact concept they're looking for here. I might need to think it through a bit more.
MI
Mi
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is Defense in Depth, since that's the security concept that provides redundancy in case of a failure or vulnerability.
NI
Nickolas
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky probability question. I'll need to think through the steps carefully to solve it.
DE
Detra
1 year ago
I think I remember something about monitoring unhealthy instances, but it's a bit fuzzy. Maybe it's related to the UnhealthyHostCount?
SV
Svetlana
1 year ago
This looks like a classic probability problem. I'll need to think through the probabilities of the different defect types and how they relate to the probability of no defects.
EL
Elouise
2 years ago
Hmm, Sandboxing seems intriguing. I wonder if I can use it to play Minesweeper at work without getting caught.
ST
Stefania
1 year ago
D) Defence in depth.
DO
Domitila
1 year ago
C) Intrusion Prevention System.
GO
Golda
2 years ago
B) Sandboxing.
DO
Dorsey
2 years ago
A) System Integrity.
KA
Kayleigh
2 years ago
I'd go with Intrusion Prevention System. Sounds like it's got your back, you know? Like a superhero for your network.
LI
Lindsey
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Intrusion Prevention System could also provide some level of redundancy.
AN
An
2 years ago
I agree with Sophia, Defence in depth provides redundancy in case of security control failure.
FE
Fernanda
2 years ago
Definitely D. Defence in depth. Gotta have layers of security, like an onion...or a parfait.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
Definitely D. Defence in depth. Gotta have layers of security, like an onion...or a parfait.
FE
Felton
1 year ago
D) Defence in depth.
UL
Ula
1 year ago
C) Intrusion Prevention System.
KI
King
1 year ago
B) Sandboxing.
SH
Sharen
1 year ago
A) System Integrity.
SO
Sophia
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Defence in depth.
FR
France
2 years ago
Defence in depth? That sounds like a fancy term for 'don't put all your eggs in one basket'.