Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS CISMP-V9 Exam - Topic 2 Question 81 Discussion

Which security concept provides redundancy in the event a security control failure or the exploitation of a vulnerability?
B) Sandboxing.
A) System Integrity.
C) Intrusion Prevention System.
D) Defence in depth.

BCS CISMP-V9 Exam - Topic 2 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CISMP-V9 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 2
[All CISMP-V9 Questions]

Which security concept provides redundancy in the event a security control failure or the exploitation of a vulnerability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is the current specification for the encryption of electronic data established by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). AES is a symmetric block cipher that can encrypt (encipher) and decrypt (decipher) information, converting data to an unintelligible form called ciphertext and back to its original form, plaintext. The AES algorithm is capable of using cryptographic keys of 128, 192, and 256 bits to encrypt and decrypt data in blocks of 128 bits.It was selected by NIST as a Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) to protect electronic data and is widely recognized and used for secure data encryption1.


by Georgeanna at Aug 06, 2024, 08:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISMP-V9 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mollie
8 months ago
"Sandboxing" is cool, but it doesn't really fit this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
8 months ago
Wait, can "System Integrity" really provide redundancy? Not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
8 months ago
Yeah, "Defence in depth" is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
9 months ago
I think "Intrusion Prevention System" is more relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
9 months ago
Definitely "Defence in depth" for redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think "defense in depth" was the answer there too. It just makes sense for redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
9 months ago
I feel like "intrusion prevention systems" are more about active monitoring rather than redundancy, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about redundancy being a key part of "defense in depth."
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
10 months ago
I think "defense in depth" is the right answer since it emphasizes multiple layers of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
10 months ago
I'm feeling a bit confused on this one. I know the concepts, but I'm not sure which one specifically provides redundancy in the event of a failure or vulnerability. I'll have to review my notes and think it through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
10 months ago
Okay, let me see here. System Integrity is about ensuring the system hasn't been tampered with, Sandboxing is about isolating applications, and an Intrusion Prevention System is a specific security tool. I think Defense in Depth is the best answer, since it's the broader concept of having multiple overlapping security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Defense in Depth is about having multiple layers of security controls, but I'm not sure if that's the exact concept they're looking for here. I might need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
10 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is Defense in Depth, since that's the security concept that provides redundancy in case of a failure or vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky probability question. I'll need to think through the steps carefully to solve it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
10 months ago
I think I remember something about monitoring unhealthy instances, but it's a bit fuzzy. Maybe it's related to the UnhealthyHostCount?
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
10 months ago
This looks like a classic probability problem. I'll need to think through the probabilities of the different defect types and how they relate to the probability of no defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 year ago
Hmm, Sandboxing seems intriguing. I wonder if I can use it to play Minesweeper at work without getting caught.
upvoted 0 times
Stefania
1 year ago
D) Defence in depth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
1 year ago
C) Intrusion Prevention System.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
1 year ago
B) Sandboxing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
1 year ago
A) System Integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I'd go with Intrusion Prevention System. Sounds like it's got your back, you know? Like a superhero for your network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Intrusion Prevention System could also provide some level of redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
I agree with Sophia, Defence in depth provides redundancy in case of security control failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
1 year ago
Definitely D. Defence in depth. Gotta have layers of security, like an onion...or a parfait.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
1 year ago
Definitely D. Defence in depth. Gotta have layers of security, like an onion...or a parfait.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
1 year ago
D) Defence in depth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 year ago
C) Intrusion Prevention System.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 year ago
B) Sandboxing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
1 year ago
A) System Integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Defence in depth.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
Defence in depth? That sounds like a fancy term for 'don't put all your eggs in one basket'.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel