Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS Exam CISMP-V9 Topic 1 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CISMP-V9 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 1
[All CISMP-V9 Questions]

Why have MOST European countries developed specific legislation that permits police and security services to monitor communications traffic for specific purposes, such as the detection of crime?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Virgie at Feb 12, 2024, 09:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISMP-V9 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marg
1 months ago
Option C is the funniest one - can you imagine the police just randomly intercepting everyone's calls and messages before? What a wild west that must have been!
upvoted 0 times
Tuyet
17 hours ago
A) Under the European Convention of Human Rights, the interception of telecommunications represents an interference with the right to privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Broderick
1 months ago
I'm going with A. The right to privacy is a fundamental human right, so any interference by the authorities would need to be explicitly allowed by new legislation.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
4 days ago
C) Police could previously intercept without lawful authority any communications in the course of transmission through a public post or telecoms system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
17 days ago
A) I agree, privacy should be protected by law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
29 days ago
B) GDPR overrides all previous legislation on information handling, so new laws were needed to ensure authorities did not inadvertently break the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 months ago
A) Under the European Convention of Human Rights, the interception of telecommunications represents an interference with the right to privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Onita
1 months ago
Hmm, D seems plausible. If the 1950 Human Rights Convention made surveillance illegal, then new laws would be required to permit it for legitimate purposes like crime detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
2 months ago
B) GDPR overrides all previous legislation on information handling, so new laws were needed to ensure authorities did not inadvertently break the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The GDPR introduced new data protection rules, so authorities would need updated legislation to ensure their surveillance activities are legally compliant.
upvoted 0 times
Lorrie
19 days ago
B) GDPR overrides all previous legislation on information handling, so new laws were needed to ensure authorities did not inadvertently break the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
23 days ago
A) Under the European Convention of Human Rights, the interception of telecommunications represents an interference with the right to privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
26 days ago
B) GDPR overrides all previous legislation on information handling, so new laws were needed to ensure authorities did not inadvertently break the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
1 months ago
A) Under the European Convention of Human Rights, the interception of telecommunications represents an interference with the right to privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coletta
2 months ago
C) Police could previously intercept without lawful authority any communications in the course of transmission through a public post or telecoms system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
Option C seems logical. If the police could intercept communications without any legal authority, then new laws would be needed to regulate this and ensure proper oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 months ago
A) Under the European Convention of Human Rights, the interception of telecommunications represents an interference with the right to privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel