Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS CISMP-V9 Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CISMP-V9 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All CISMP-V9 Questions]

Which of the following describes a qualitative risk assessment approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cecil at Sep 19, 2022, 02:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISMP-V9 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Francene
7 months ago
Not sure about A, feels too vague to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
7 months ago
Wait, is A really the only qualitative method?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
7 months ago
A subjective approach? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
7 months ago
I think B makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
7 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
8 months ago
I feel like D is more about risk management frameworks rather than directly assessing risk qualitatively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
8 months ago
I’m pretty sure that Monte-Carlo Analysis is more quantitative, so C doesn’t fit with qualitative assessments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think qualitative means not relying on hard data, which makes me unsure about B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
8 months ago
I think qualitative risk assessment is more about subjective judgments, so I’m leaning towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
8 months ago
Okay, let me take a closer look at the details. It looks like we need to configure an access control list (ACL) to deny OSPF and ICMP packets on the GigabitEthernet0/0/1 interface. I think I can handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
8 months ago
I recall a similar question where we discussed the importance of comparing with facilities that have superior performance. That could definitely help us improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about trust mechanisms between a customer and a provider. I'll need to think through the options carefully, but I'm confident I can identify the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
Option A? More like option 'Eh, close enough.' Amirite, folks? Qualitative risk assessment, where the 'quality' is how well I can bullsh*t my way through it.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
11 months ago
D) The use of Risk Tolerance and Risk Appetite values to determine the overall severity of a risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
11 months ago
C) The use of Monte-Carlo Analysis and Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
11 months ago
User 3: User Comment: Option A? More like option 'Eh, close enough.' Amirite, folks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
11 months ago
User 2: B) The use of verifiable data to predict the risk occurrence likelihood and the potential impact so as to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
B) The use of verifiable data to predict the risk occurrence likelihood and the potential impact so as to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
12 months ago
A) A subjective assessment of risk occurrence likelihood against the potential impact that determines the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
12 months ago
User 1: A) A subjective assessment of risk occurrence likelihood against the potential impact that determines the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nada
1 year ago
D, all the way. Risk tolerance and appetite? Sounds like they're trying to make this as complicated as possible. I'm just gonna go with my 'keep it simple, stupid' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Milly
12 months ago
B) The use of verifiable data to predict the risk occurrence likelihood and the potential impact so as to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
12 months ago
D) The use of Risk Tolerance and Risk Appetite values to determine the overall severity of a risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 year ago
A) A subjective assessment of risk occurrence likelihood against the potential impact that determines the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
1 year ago
C, for sure! Monte-Carlo and LOPA? That's some high-level risk assessment stuff right there. I'm feeling fancy just reading it.
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
1 year ago
It's important to have a comprehensive approach when assessing risks, and these methods definitely help in that aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
1 year ago
I agree, using Monte-Carlo Analysis and LOPA definitely adds a sophisticated touch to risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Therese
1 year ago
B seems solid, using data to make informed decisions. That's my jam. Gotta love those verifiable facts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
1 year ago
Option A sounds like the way to go. I'm more of a 'gut feeling' kind of risk assessor, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
1 year ago
Bulah: I guess it all comes down to personal preference in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
1 year ago
User 3: I'm with you on that, Lucille. Option B sounds more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
User 2: I prefer using verifiable data, so option B is my choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like a more subjective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but A does sound like a subjective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I agree with Twana, A makes sense for qualitative risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel