Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam BAPv5 Topic 2 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's BAPv5 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 2
[All BAPv5 Questions]

Bessant Co.manufactures and sells clothing. The company is every profitable and the IT director would like to invest some of these profits into improving the technical infrastructure of the company, which would help the organic growth of the company. However, the finance director would like to use the profits to acquire one of its competitors.

Shelly is the business analyst on this project and she recognises that the IT and finance director do not agree on the future direction of the business. Once prefers organic growth and the other, growth by acquisition.

What technique COULD Shelly use to improve her understating ot these two different perspectives?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The stakeholder management strategy for senior managers should be constant active management. Senior managers have high power and high interest in the project, as they are responsible for overseeing its implementation and ensuring its alignment with organizational goals. They also have influence over other stakeholders, such as end users and employees. Therefore, they need to be regularly engaged, consulted, informed, and involved in decision making throughout the project lifecycle. Option B is the correct answer.


Stakeholder Analysis using the Power Interest Grid - ProjectManagement.com

Power Interest Grid: How to Use, Benefits, Examples - KnowledgeHut

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mica
16 days ago
The finance director must be a real 'Scrooge' to want to use the profits for acquisition instead of investing in the company's growth. Bah, humbug!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
16 days ago
CATWOE? Really? That's way too complex for this simple decision. Shelly should keep it simple and go with the power/interest grid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
17 days ago
The POPIT model seems like a bit of a stretch here. I don't see how that would really help Shelly in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
25 days ago
SWOT analysis could be a good option as well. It would allow Shelly to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
10 hours ago
C) SWOT analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
10 days ago
B) The power/ interest grid
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
15 days ago
A) CATWOE.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
1 months ago
I think the power/interest grid would be the best technique for Shelly to use. It would help her understand the different stakeholders and their level of influence on the decision.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
9 days ago
B) The power/ interest grid
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
23 days ago
A) CATWOE.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilbert
2 months ago
I think SWOT analysis could also be useful in this situation to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
2 months ago
I agree with Lyla, the power/interest grid would help Shelly see where each director is coming from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
2 months ago
I think Shelly could use the power/interest grid to understand the perspectives better.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel