Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam AIF Topic 11 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's AIF exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 11
[All AIF Questions]

What technique can be adopted when a weak learners hypothesis accuracy is only slightly better than 50%?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Weak Learner: Colloquially, a model that performs slightly better than a naive model.

More formally, the notion has been generalized to multi-class classification and has a different meaning beyond better than 50 percent accuracy.

For binary classification, it is well known that the exact requirement for weak learners is to be better than random guess. [...] Notice that requiring base learners to be better than random guess is too weak for multi-class problems, yet requiring better than 50% accuracy is too stringent.

--- Page 46,Ensemble Methods, 2012.

It is based on formal computational learning theory that proposes a class of learning methods that possess weakly learnability, meaning that they perform better than random guessing. Weak learnability is proposed as a simplification of the more desirable strong learnability, where a learnable achieved arbitrary good classification accuracy.

A weaker model of learnability, called weak learnability, drops the requirement that the learner be able to achieve arbitrarily high accuracy; a weak learning algorithm needs only output an hypothesis that performs slightly better (by an inverse polynomial) than random guessing.

---The Strength of Weak Learnability, 1990.

It is a useful concept as it is often used to describe the capabilities of contributing members of ensemble learning algorithms. For example, sometimes members of a bootstrap aggregation are referred to as weak learners as opposed to strong, at least in the colloquial meaning of the term.

More specifically, weak learners are the basis for the boosting class of ensemble learning algorithms.

The term boosting refers to a family of algorithms that are able to convert weak learners to strong learners.

https://machinelearningmastery.com/strong-learners-vs-weak-learners-for-ensemble-learning/

The best technique to adopt when a weak learner's hypothesis accuracy is only slightly better than 50% is boosting. Boosting is an ensemble learning technique that combines multiple weak learners (i.e., models with a low accuracy) to create a more powerful model. Boosting works by iteratively learning a series of weak learners, each of which is slightly better than random guessing. The output of each weak learner is then combined to form a more accurate model. Boosting is a powerful technique that has been proven to improve the accuracy of a wide range of machine learning tasks. For more information, please see the BCS Foundation Certificate In Artificial Intelligence Study Guide or the resources listed above.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tamra
2 days ago
I think over-fitting is a common mistake here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
8 days ago
Boosting is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
14 days ago
Boosting definitely rings a bell as a technique to enhance performance when accuracy is just above random chance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
19 days ago
Iteration sounds familiar, but I feel like it’s more about refining models rather than addressing weak learner accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
24 days ago
I remember something about overfitting, but that doesn't seem to fit here since we're talking about weak learners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
1 month ago
I think boosting might be the right answer since it helps improve weak learners, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 month ago
Boosting sounds like the right answer, but I'm not 100% confident. I should review my notes on ensemble methods to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know Boosting is used to combine multiple weak learners, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 month ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is Boosting, since that's a technique used to improve the accuracy of weak learners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
1 month ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the weak learner is only slightly better than 50%, then Boosting could be a good option to improve its performance. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Task Scheduler can automate tasks, but I'm not sure how it specifically helps with synchronizing a geodatabase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 month ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The key is understanding the integration between Stealthwatch and ISE. Since the question mentions Adaptive Network Control policy, I think the answer is most likely pxGrid, which is the recommended method for this type of integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 month ago
Wait, aren't all these elements typically mandatory? This feels like a tricky question. I'd carefully read each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll have to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
1 year ago
Boosting, for sure! It's like taking a weak learner and giving it a caffeine boost. Now that's what I call a wake-up call!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 year ago
Over-fitting? That's like trying to squeeze a square peg into a round hole. Boosting is the clear winner here, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
1 year ago
Iteration, huh? That's like going around in circles. Nah, Boosting is the way to go, it's the superhero of weak learners!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
Activation? Really? That's like trying to wake up a sleeping sloth. I'm going with Boosting, it's the obvious choice.
upvoted 0 times
Micheal
1 year ago
I agree, Boosting is a powerful technique for improving the performance of weak learners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 year ago
Boosting is definitely the way to go. It helps improve the accuracy of weak learners.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think over-fitting is also a common technique in such cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
1 year ago
Hmm, I think Boosting is the way to go here. It's like giving a weak learner a steroid boost to improve its accuracy!
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
1 year ago
I agree, it's like giving a weak learner a boost to improve its accuracy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
1 year ago
Boosting is definitely the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
1 year ago
I agree with Juliana, Boosting can be used to improve accuracy of weak learners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Boosting.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel