Which of the following is an outcome of personnel embracing Business Continuity (BC) and the organization's Business Continuity Management System (BCMS)?
In GPG 7.0, Embracing Business Continuity (PP2) is about embedding BC into the organization---moving away from ''mandating and enforcing compliance'' and instead shaping behaviours, ownership, and understanding so BC becomes part of ''how we do things here.'' When people genuinely embrace BC, the BCMS is more likely to be implemented in a way that fits the organization's real operating context, language, and norms. That naturally leads to a BC programme that is bespoke to the organization and its culture (option A) rather than a generic, copied framework.
The other options describe outcomes that may happen in some cases but are not reliable or primary indicators of embracing BC. Strong financial performance (B) is not a direct or guaranteed outcome; BC investments can be cost-neutral or even reduced when smartly targeted. Staff turnover reductions from rewards (C) is speculative and depends on HR policy, not BC culture alone. Reduced need for support from external customers/partners (D) misunderstands continuity: embracing BC typically increases structured engagement with key stakeholders, not removes it.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!