Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BACB BCBA Exam - Topic 3 Question 97 Discussion

Posted by Luis on Sep 18, 2024 at 06:56 AM

Non-contingent reinforcement is this type of intervention:

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium BCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
DE
Deja 10 months ago
A makes the most sense based on what we've learned!
BR
Brandon 11 months ago
I thought non-contingent reinforcement was more about punishment?
RO
Rodolfo 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not a consequent intervention?
HI
Hillary 11 months ago
Totally agree, A is the right choice!
LU
Lucia 11 months ago
It's definitely an antecedent intervention!
DE
Deandrea 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards it being an antecedent intervention, but I could see how it might be confused with punishment strategies too.
YO
Yong 12 months ago
I feel like non-contingent reinforcement might relate to behavioral momentum, but I can't recall the specifics.
JU
Judy 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think it was classified as a consequent intervention.
BA
Basilia 1 year ago
I think non-contingent reinforcement is more about antecedents, but I'm not completely sure.
LO
Louvenia 1 year ago
Based on my understanding, non-contingent reinforcement is an antecedent intervention, where you provide reinforcement without it being dependent on the person's behavior. So I'm going to go with option A.
CH
Cheryl 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the question. Is non-contingent reinforcement the same as a behavioral momentum intervention? I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand the difference between these concepts.
KA
Katina 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know non-contingent reinforcement is a type of intervention, but I'm not sure if it's considered an antecedent or consequent intervention. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. Non-contingent reinforcement is a type of antecedent intervention, so I'll go with option A.
WA
Wade 1 year ago
Okay, I remember learning about non-contingent reinforcement in class. It's when you provide reinforcement regardless of the person's behavior, so it's not a punishment strategy. I think option B is the correct answer.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it. The key is to identify the mandatory steps required for the US employees to enter their time and for the costs to be distributed successfully.
JI
Jimmie 1 year ago
As an aspiring behavioral analyst, I can't help but chuckle at the thought of non-contingent reinforcement being a 'punishment strategy'. That's like rewarding someone for doing nothing. I'll take B) Consequent intervention, please!
MA
Marget 1 year ago
A) Antecedent intervention? Really? That doesn't seem right at all. I'm going with B) Consequent intervention, no doubt about it.
AL
Alex 1 year ago
B) Consequent intervention makes the most sense to me. Non-contingent reinforcement doesn't rely on any specific behavior, so it's definitely a consequent-based approach.
LA
Lai 1 year ago
Hmm, I was thinking it could be D) Behavioral momentum intervention, since non-contingent reinforcement can increase the likelihood of the target behavior occurring. But I'll go with B) to be safe.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lai
I'll stick with B) Consequent intervention too.
LE
Lenita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lai
I'm going with B) Consequent intervention as well.
EV
Evette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lai
I agree, it could also be D) Behavioral momentum intervention.
FL
Flo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lai
I think it's B) Consequent intervention.
BE
Bette 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's B) Consequent intervention. Non-contingent reinforcement provides reinforcement regardless of the individual's behavior, so it's a consequent-based approach.
FA
Fabiola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bette
That makes sense, it's about providing reinforcement after the behavior.
MA
Mariko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bette
Non-contingent reinforcement is definitely a consequent intervention.
TE
Teri 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bette
I think you're right, it's B) Consequent intervention.
JA
Jarod 1 year ago
Hmm, I see your point. Maybe it could also be considered a punishment strategy.
DO
Dorothea 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it is an antecedent intervention.
JA
Jarod 2 years ago
I think non-contingent reinforcement is a consequent intervention.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel