MENU
From an ethical standpoint, which source provides the MOST appropriate information for justifying implementation of a program to change a person's behavior?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium BCABA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
DY
Dylan
10 months ago
Wait, are we really considering admin requests over direct care insights?
GA
Gail
11 months ago
Written recommendations from medical staff? Not sure that's enough.
AU
Audra
11 months ago
Graphed data is more objective though, right?
NI
Nichelle
11 months ago
Totally agree, they see the person every day!
OW
Owen
11 months ago
I think daily reports from direct care staff are the most reliable.
DO
Dolores
12 months ago
I recall that administrative requests might not be the most ethical source since they aren't directly involved in the person's care.
BR
Brynn
12 months ago
I feel like written recommendations from medical staff could also be important, but I wonder if they have enough direct observation to justify behavior change.
FL
Flo
12 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I remember a practice question where daily reports were emphasized for their direct insight into a person's behavior.
PE
Pearlene
1 year ago
I think option B might be the best choice since graphed data can provide clear evidence of behavior changes over time.
RO
Ronna
1 year ago
The medical staff recommendations seem like the way to go here. They have the clinical expertise and understanding of the person's overall health and needs, which should take priority in an ethical decision.
CO
Colby
1 year ago
I think the graphed data from the program staff would be the most appropriate source. They have the most direct and regular observations of the person's behavior, which seems the most relevant for an ethical justification.
PE
Peggy
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure which source would be the most ethical for justifying a behavior change program. I'll have to review the options closely.
JA
Janey
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the ethical implications of each source and which one would provide the most appropriate information.
KA
Karma
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one would best resolve the issue.
DE
Dean
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like it's testing my knowledge of the AXL schema. I'll need to carefully analyze the diagram and options to determine the valid elements.
MA
Marget
1 year ago
I feel uncertain about which rules apply here. I think it's Rule 6 that mentions social interactions, but I'm not entirely sure if it directly relates to this situation.
CA
Casie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know uppercase letters are represented by [A-Z], but I'm not sure if that's the only way to do it. Let me think this through a bit more.
WA
Wava
1 year ago
I'm uncertain if non-existent domains count as a trigger. But I feel like I've seen that mentioned in other materials.
VO
Von
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. Is the Expression transformation also a valid option for filtering the data? I'll need to double-check the details on that.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
I think Option B might be the right choice because it seems to match the schema best, but I'm not completely sure.
SU
Susana
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is 42. It's the answer to everything, right?
NI
Nidia
1 year ago
C) written recommendations from the medical staff who treat the person on a regular basis
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
B) graphed data from the program staff who observe the person regularly
IR
Irving
1 year ago
A) daily reports from the direct care staff who work with the person routinely
RE
Reita
1 year ago
Option E: Consult the person's pet chihuahua. They always know what's best.
MA
Marylou
1 year ago
D) written requests from the administrative staff who are ultimately responsible for the person's care
CH
Cheryll
1 year ago
C) written recommendations from the medical staff who treat the person on a regular basis
CY
Cyndy
1 year ago
B) graphed data from the program staff who observe the person regularly
AL
Allene
1 year ago
B) graphed data from the program staff who observe the person regularly
MA
Mari
1 year ago
A) daily reports from the direct care staff who work with the person routinely
JU
Juan
1 year ago
A) daily reports from the direct care staff who work with the person routinely
MO
Mohammad
1 year ago
Seriously? None of these options seem very ethical to me. I'd suggest a group therapy session with the staff, the person, and their family to come up with a collaborative solution.
GE
Georgene
1 year ago
D is the way to go. The administrative staff are the ones calling the shots, so their written requests should carry the most weight.
LO
Lourdes
2 years ago
I'd go with B. Graphed data from the program staff who observe the person regularly seems like the most objective and data-driven approach.
EM
Emmanuel
2 years ago
I see your points, but I personally think option C is the most appropriate.
CO
Colette
2 years ago
Option C looks the most appropriate to me. The medical staff would have the most informed and relevant input on the person's condition and needs.
PA
Pamella
1 year ago
That's true, but the medical staff's recommendations would be more objective and based on medical knowledge.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
But wouldn't the direct care staff who work with the person daily have more detailed insights into their behavior?
OR
Oren
1 year ago
I agree, the medical staff's recommendations would be based on their expertise and experience.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
Option C looks the most appropriate to me. The medical staff would have the most informed and relevant input on the person's condition and needs.
SH
Sherell
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more reliable.
TO
Tori
2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice.