Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Atlassian Exam ACP-100 Topic 5 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Atlassian's ACP-100 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 5
[All ACP-100 Questions]

Critical production bugs in a Jira Software project are hidden with an issue security scheme that has a single

security level.

Only project administrators are listed in the security level and granted the Set Issue Security permission.

A new requirement states that a few other Jira Core users, who have Browse Projects permission, should be able to see the hidden issues. These users will vary per issue and be selected from across various groups.

What needs to be added to the security level?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ashton
23 days ago
Group is the way to go, no doubt about it. Keeps things simple and maintainable. Option F is the winner!
upvoted 0 times
Kristian
7 days ago
User2: Definitely, it will make it easier to manage access for different users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
12 days ago
User1: I agree, using a group for the security level is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
25 days ago
Ooh, B, User custom field value, sounds like a creative solution. But I'm not sure how well that would scale in the long run. I'll stick with F, Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
26 days ago
Haha, imagine if the answer was E, Single Users. That would be a nightmare to manage! I'm going with C, Group custom field value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
29 days ago
I think D, Project role, is the best choice here. You can easily assign the necessary permissions to specific roles and avoid managing individual users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
1 months ago
I believe adding Group custom field value is the best choice as it allows flexibility in selecting users from different groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 months ago
I think Project role could also be a good option to add to the security level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 months ago
I agree with Tamekia, adding Group custom field value would allow us to select users from different groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 months ago
I think we should add Group custom field value to the security level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
2 months ago
Option F is the way to go. Group access is the easiest way to manage this requirement. Plus, it's more secure than individual users.
upvoted 0 times
Joseph
12 days ago
Group access definitely simplifies the process and ensures that the right people have access to the critical production bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
17 days ago
I agree, using groups for security levels makes it easier to manage permissions for multiple users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
20 days ago
Option F is the way to go. Group access is the easiest way to manage this requirement. Plus, it's more secure than individual users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 months ago
C) Group
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 months ago
B) Group
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
1 months ago
A) Group
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel