Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB Exam - Topic 4 Question 74 Discussion

Posted by Tiffiny on Aug 08, 2024 at 12:35 PM

Which type of application is more portable?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium ASTQB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
44 comments · newest first
LI
Lili 11 months ago
I agree, hybrid apps can run on multiple platforms easily!
LA
Lawrence 11 months ago
Wait, are you sure hybrid apps are more portable?
SE
Serita 12 months ago
Both types have their pros and cons.
AR
Art 12 months ago
I think native apps are less portable, right?
MA
Marguerita 1 year ago
Hybrid apps are generally more portable!
JE
Jean 1 year ago
I feel like both options could be portable to some extent, but I can't recall the specifics on why one would be better than the other.
CH
Cherry 1 year ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I think both types have their pros and cons, but hybrid apps usually win in portability.
LA
Layla 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about native apps being tied to specific operating systems, which might make them less portable.
CH
Chantay 1 year ago
I think hybrid mobile applications are generally more portable since they can run on multiple platforms.
MA
Marsha 1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I thought native apps were more portable since they're optimized for a specific platform. But then again, hybrid apps can run on multiple platforms. I'll have to review the differences between the two to decide.
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Native apps are built for a specific platform, so they're not as portable as hybrid apps that can run on multiple platforms. I'm confident that B is the right answer.
HE
Herschel 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure hybrid mobile apps are more portable since they can run on multiple platforms, but I'll double-check the differences between native and hybrid to make sure.
KE
Kerrie 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know native apps are built specifically for a single platform, but I'm not sure if that makes them less portable. I'll have to think this through carefully.
ST
Starr 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure "Reopen" is an invalid state for an alert, since an alert can't be reopened once it's been closed.
MA
Marsha 1 year ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. Cisco has a lot of different cloud security products, and I'm not sure which one specifically handles the requirements mentioned in the question. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
BE
Beata 1 year ago
Key strategy: look for controls that create barriers before transactions happen, not just tracking what already occurred. Number 2 and 4 seem strongest.
CH
Cherrie 2 years ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm going to go with my gut and choose C. Both types have their pros and cons when it comes to portability.
DO
Dorcas 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cherrie
I disagree, I believe hybrid mobile applications are more portable.
AL
Alexis 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cherrie
I think native mobile applications are more portable.
GL
Glenna 2 years ago
Hybrid apps are the future! Portability and cross-platform compatibility are their biggest advantages. B is the correct answer, no doubt.
CE
Celeste 2 years ago
I think the question is a bit misleading. Portability depends on the specific implementation, not the app type. Let's move on to the next one.
CH
Cherrie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celeste
Let's move on to the next question.
NI
Nilsa 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celeste
Yeah, portability really depends on how the app is implemented.
BE
Benton 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celeste
I agree, the question is not clear. Let's skip to the next one.
RH
Rhea 2 years ago
I agree with Natalya, both native and hybrid applications are easily portable.
CA
Carmen 2 years ago
C'mon, guys! Both options are portable. This question is just trying to trick us. I'll go with D.
LO
Loreta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carmen
Definitely, D is the correct choice. Both types of applications are easily portable.
AN
Annamae 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carmen
I agree, both options are portable. Let's go with D.
CO
Colby 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carmen
D) Both are easily portable
MA
Mariann 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carmen
C) Both are not portable
JA
James 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carmen
B) Hybrid mobile application
JE
Jeanice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carmen
A) Native mobile application
NA
Natalya 2 years ago
I think both are easily portable because they can be used on multiple platforms.
BU
Bulah 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe native mobile applications are more portable.
DO
Doug 2 years ago
Option A is the way to go. Native apps may have limited portability, but they offer better performance and user experience.
GE
Georgene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Doug
D) Both are easily portable
RE
Renato 2 years ago
↳ replying to Doug
I agree, native apps may not be as portable but they definitely offer better performance.
CR
Cruz 2 years ago
↳ replying to Doug
A) Native mobile application
MA
Maryann 2 years ago
I'm going with option B. Hybrid apps are more portable since they can run on multiple platforms.
AI
Aide 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryann
It's true, hybrid apps can be easily adapted to different operating systems.
LE
Lelia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryann
Hybrid apps are a great choice for reaching a wider audience.
AM
Amber 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryann
I think native apps are more limited in terms of portability.
MA
Marget 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryann
I agree with you, hybrid apps are definitely more portable.
HU
Hubert 2 years ago
I think hybrid mobile applications are more portable.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel