Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

You are testing a native application for a smart phone. The application allows the user to make grocery lists on the phone and store up to three lists at a time. A list can contain up to 50 items.Which of the following is the minimum set of test conditions to achieve 100% coverage with the boundary value analysis test technique?
B) List with 0 items, List with 1 item, List with 50 items, List with 51 items, 0 lists saved, 1 list saved, 3 lists saved, 4 lists saved
A) List with 47 items
C) List with 0 items, List with 25 items, List with 51 items, 3 lists saved
D) List with 0 items, List with 12 item, List with 58 items, 0 lists saved, 1 list saved, 3 lists saved, 7 lists saved

ASTQB Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's ASTQB exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All ASTQB Questions]

You are testing a native application for a smart phone. The application allows the user to make grocery lists on the phone and store up to three lists at a time. A list can contain up to 50 items.

Which of the following is the minimum set of test conditions to achieve 100% coverage with the boundary value analysis test technique?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

B is correct because it is doing BVA on both the list quantity and the list saving capability. D is incorrect because it has achieved EP coverage, but didn't get the boundaries. A is incorrect because it doesn't consider the list save capabilities and it doesn't test the invalid values for the list. C is incorrect because it does not sufficiently test the save feature.


by Marleen at Aug 04, 2025, 09:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASTQB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Izetta
9 months ago
I’m surprised they allow only 3 lists, seems too limiting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
9 months ago
Wait, why would we test 51 items? That’s not even allowed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
9 months ago
Definitely B, it hits all the boundaries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
10 months ago
I think A is enough, 47 items is close enough!
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
Option B covers all the edge cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
10 months ago
I thought we only needed to test the exact limits, but now I'm wondering if we should also include cases like 51 items or 4 lists saved to really cover everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
10 months ago
I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, but I can't recall if we needed to test just above and below the limits for both items and lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
11 months ago
I think option B looks familiar because it includes the minimum and maximum values for both items and lists, which seems like a good approach for 100% coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
11 months ago
I remember we discussed boundary value analysis in class, but I'm not sure if I covered all the edge cases for the number of items and lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll just go with option B - it covers all the key boundary conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. I'll need to test a list with 0 items, 1 item, 50 items, and 51 items. And for the saved lists, I'll need to test 0, 1, 3, and 4 lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do I need to test every single possible value, or can I just focus on the boundaries?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
This looks like a classic boundary value analysis problem. I'll need to test the edge cases for the list size and number of saved lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
B looks like the way to go. Gotta test all the edge cases, you know? 0, 1, 50, and 51 items? Nailed it. And the list saves too? Perfect coverage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel