Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB Exam - Topic 1 Question 94 Discussion

Which of the following is a reason to use simulators for testing?
B) Real devices can be difficult and expensive to procure in large quantities
A) Simulators give more accurate performance than real devices
C) Simulators can interact with users to provide feedback on usability
D) Real devices can be quickly configured to provide new testing scenarios

ASTQB Exam - Topic 1 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's ASTQB exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 1
[All ASTQB Questions]

Which of the following is a reason to use simulators for testing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

B is correct. A is incorrect because real devices will always be more accurate. C is incorrect because usability requires the look and feel of the real device. D is not true on a large scale and may not even be true on a small scale. A well-designed simulator should be easier to re-configure as needed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cecil
9 months ago
Real devices are still the best for performance testing, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
9 months ago
Simulators can definitely help with usability feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
9 months ago
Totally agree, especially for large-scale testing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
10 months ago
Wait, are simulators really more accurate? I thought real devices were better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
10 months ago
Simulators are way cheaper than real devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
10 months ago
I feel like real devices can be configured quickly, but I’m not sure if that’s a reason to prefer them over simulators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think simulators are great for user feedback on usability, which is super important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
10 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think simulators might not always give more accurate performance than real devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
11 months ago
I remember that simulators are often used because real devices can be really hard to get in bulk, especially for testing purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
11 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. Simulators are great because you can easily test a wide range of configurations and get user feedback, without needing to have tons of physical devices on hand. I think I know the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key advantages of simulators are that they provide more accurate performance data and allow for easier testing of different scenarios. I'm confident I can identify the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know simulators can be useful, but I'm not sure I fully understand the differences between simulators and real devices for testing. I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the benefits of using simulators for testing. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about the key advantages of simulators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 year ago
That's true, Gracie. Both options have their benefits depending on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
B for sure. I once had to wait 6 months to get our hands on a specific device. Simulators save so much time and hassle.
upvoted 0 times
Sol
12 months ago
B) That's true, simulators definitely save time and hassle
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
12 months ago
A) Simulators give more accurate performance than real devices
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
12 months ago
B) Real devices can be difficult and expensive to procure in large quantities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracie
1 year ago
But what about D) Real devices can be quickly configured to provide new testing scenarios? That could be important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 year ago
I agree with Ruthann. It makes sense to use simulators for testing to save costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 year ago
I think B) Real devices can be difficult and expensive to procure in large quantities is a good reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 year ago
Haha, D sounds like the answer a lazy engineer would give. Real devices are great, but who has time to reconfigure them all the time?
upvoted 0 times
Luther
12 months ago
A) Simulators give more accurate performance than real devices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
1 year ago
A and C seem like the most compelling options to me. Accuracy and usability feedback are both crucial for effective testing.
upvoted 0 times
Nakisha
1 year ago
I think simulators can provide valuable feedback from users during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
Simulators are definitely more cost-effective than buying real devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
1 year ago
I agree, accuracy and usability are key for testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
1 year ago
I'd go with C. Simulators can give valuable feedback on user interactions, which is crucial for improving design.
upvoted 0 times
Lisbeth
1 year ago
I agree, simulators can provide valuable insights on user interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 year ago
I think C is a good choice. User feedback is important for design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
1 year ago
Definitely B. Procuring real devices can be a logistical nightmare, especially for large-scale testing.
upvoted 0 times
Mona
1 year ago
A) Simulators give more accurate performance than real devices
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 year ago
B) Real devices can be difficult and expensive to procure in large quantities
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel