Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

In a project that is feature-rich but time-poor, which is the most reasonable approach to risk analysis?
B) Use a lightweight approach and assign relative importance of each identified item
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
C) Skip the risk analysis step and proceed to test execution based on experience
D) Concentrate on the functional capabilities and disregard the physical capabilities of the device since those should be tested by the manufacturer

ASTQB Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's ASTQB exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All ASTQB Questions]

In a project that is feature-rich but time-poor, which is the most reasonable approach to risk analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Valentine at Mar 16, 2024, 08:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASTQB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ronna
10 months ago
Surprised anyone would consider skipping risk analysis altogether!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
10 months ago
D? Really? That sounds risky to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
10 months ago
C is a bit reckless, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
10 months ago
I disagree, A is necessary for thoroughness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
11 months ago
B seems like the best option, gotta be efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
German
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but it seems like it might be overkill for a time-poor project. I just can’t decide!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
11 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to prioritize risks quickly. I feel like using a lightweight approach is similar to that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
11 months ago
I’m not sure about skipping the risk analysis entirely like in option C. That could lead to bigger issues later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
11 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense since we’re short on time. A full risk analysis could take too long.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. In a feature-rich but time-poor project, we need to focus on the most critical risks rather than getting bogged down in a full analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Skipping the risk analysis step entirely seems risky, even with the time pressure. I'd want to at least do a quick assessment of the key risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
11 months ago
I think the lightweight approach of assigning relative importance to each risk item is the most reasonable here. With the time constraints, a full risk analysis might take too long.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
Option D doesn't seem relevant to the question. The focus is on risk analysis, not on functional vs. physical testing. I'd rule that one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
12 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to find a way to externalize the endpoint and credentials so they can be easily changed without modifying the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
12 months ago
Cascading delete seems like the most straightforward solution to avoid those orphan records. I'll double-check the details, but that's my initial thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
12 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The send-flush-on-failure feature is designed to help the VPLS network recover more quickly when there's a failure on an active pseudowire. By flushing the local forwarding database, it allows the standby pseudowire to take over without having to wait for the FDB to converge. Option C seems to describe that process the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
1 year ago
Haha, D sounds like something my grandparents would suggest. 'Just focus on the important stuff, the rest will figure itself out!'
upvoted 0 times
Cecil
1 year ago
Haha, D sounds like something my grandparents would suggest. 'Just focus on the important stuff, the rest will figure itself out!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
B) Use a lightweight approach and assign relative importance of each identified item
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 year ago
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
1 year ago
D is a bit concerning. Disregarding the physical capabilities of the device could lead to serious issues down the line.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
1 year ago
D) I think we should definitely consider the physical capabilities, skipping that step could be risky
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
B) I agree, assigning relative importance seems like a practical approach in this situation
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nikita
1 year ago
C is definitely not the way to go. Skipping risk analysis is a recipe for disaster, no matter how experienced the team is.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
1 year ago
C is definitely not the way to go. Skipping risk analysis is a recipe for disaster, no matter how experienced the team is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 year ago
B) Use a lightweight approach and assign relative importance of each identified item
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chara
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think skipping risk analysis like option C is too risky. We should at least consider some form of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better. We can prioritize risks based on their relative importance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 year ago
I think B is the most reasonable approach. A full risk analysis can be time-consuming, and we need to focus on the most important items given the time constraints.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
1 year ago
I think focusing on the most critical items is key in a time-sensitive project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
1 year ago
True, we can't ignore the importance of identifying and prioritizing risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be risky to skip the risk analysis step altogether?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
I agree, a lightweight approach would be more practical in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
1 year ago
I think option A is the most reasonable approach. We need to assess the likelihood and impact of each risk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel