Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB Exam ASTQB Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's ASTQB exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All ASTQB Questions]

In a project that is feature-rich but time-poor, which is the most reasonable approach to risk analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Valentine at Mar 16, 2024, 08:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASTQB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Karol
3 months ago
Haha, D sounds like something my grandparents would suggest. 'Just focus on the important stuff, the rest will figure itself out!'
upvoted 0 times
Cecil
2 months ago
Haha, D sounds like something my grandparents would suggest. 'Just focus on the important stuff, the rest will figure itself out!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
B) Use a lightweight approach and assign relative importance of each identified item
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
2 months ago
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
4 months ago
D is a bit concerning. Disregarding the physical capabilities of the device could lead to serious issues down the line.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
2 months ago
D) I think we should definitely consider the physical capabilities, skipping that step could be risky
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
3 months ago
B) I agree, assigning relative importance seems like a practical approach in this situation
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
3 months ago
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nikita
4 months ago
C is definitely not the way to go. Skipping risk analysis is a recipe for disaster, no matter how experienced the team is.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
3 months ago
C is definitely not the way to go. Skipping risk analysis is a recipe for disaster, no matter how experienced the team is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
3 months ago
B) Use a lightweight approach and assign relative importance of each identified item
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
A) Conduct a full risk analysis, including weighted likelihood and impact ratings for each item
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chara
4 months ago
I see both points, but I think skipping risk analysis like option C is too risky. We should at least consider some form of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better. We can prioritize risks based on their relative importance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
4 months ago
I think B is the most reasonable approach. A full risk analysis can be time-consuming, and we need to focus on the most important items given the time constraints.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
3 months ago
I think focusing on the most critical items is key in a time-sensitive project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
3 months ago
True, we can't ignore the importance of identifying and prioritizing risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
But wouldn't it be risky to skip the risk analysis step altogether?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
4 months ago
I agree, a lightweight approach would be more practical in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
5 months ago
I think option A is the most reasonable approach. We need to assess the likelihood and impact of each risk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel