MENU
To determine whether a finding is a minor, isolated incident or a serious, chronic problem, an auditor should consult with the
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CQA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
FI
Filiberto
10 months ago
Is it really that straightforward? I have my doubts.
GL
Glendora
11 months ago
Totally agree, the audit team should be involved too!
VI
Virgina
11 months ago
Wait, why would the client be consulted? Seems off.
CA
Carin
11 months ago
I think the quality assurance inspector would have better insights.
LE
Leah
11 months ago
Definitely the department manager knows the most about ongoing issues.
LA
Lavera
12 months ago
I lean towards the client being the right choice since they have the overall perspective, but I wonder if that could lead to bias in the assessment.
JU
Junita
12 months ago
I feel like the quality assurance inspector would have relevant insights, but I can't recall if they have the final say on whether it's a minor or serious issue.
SA
Salome
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of the audit team in assessing findings. Maybe they should be consulted too?
CH
Chandra
1 year ago
I think the auditor should probably consult with the auditee's department manager, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best choice.
VI
Viva
1 year ago
Okay, I've got it. The team is discussing how improvements are deliberate and achieved through business analysis, so that's describing the "Change" aspect of the business analysis process. I'm confident that's the right answer.
AH
Ahmed
1 year ago
The memory reservation is clear, but I'm a bit unsure about the high latency sensitivity. Does that mean I need to disable things like power management features? I'll have to research that a bit more to make sure I understand the implications before configuring it.
NA
Nada
1 year ago
Key strategy here: look for the option that does NOT fit as a typical error source. That means one of these is probably NOT actually a real problem in the technique.
PR
Princess
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if I have enough information to answer this confidently. I might need to make an educated guess and move on to the next question.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I don't know, guys. Maybe we should ask the janitor. They probably have a better idea of what's really going on than any of those options.
EM
Emily
1 year ago
The quality assurance inspector? Really? That's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse. The audit team is clearly the right choice here.
DO
Donette
1 year ago
Consulting with the auditee's quality assurance inspector might not give us the most accurate information.
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
I agree, the audit team would provide an unbiased assessment of the situation.
VE
Verona
1 year ago
Audit team is definitely the best choice. They have the expertise to determine the severity of the finding.
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the client should be involved in this decision. That could introduce some bias. The audit team is the way to go.
LA
Latonia
1 year ago
Consulting with the auditee's quality assurance inspector could also provide valuable insights.
AL
Alise
1 year ago
The audit team would be the best choice to determine the seriousness of the finding.
GA
Gary
1 year ago
I agree, involving the client could definitely introduce bias.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
I think the auditee's department manager would be the best person to consult. They have the most intimate knowledge of the operations and can provide valuable context.
SH
Sherill
1 year ago
Yes, the audit team can provide an independent perspective on the findings.
LA
Lasandra
1 year ago
But wouldn't the audit team also have valuable insights?
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
Agreed, they would have a good understanding of the situation.
MA
Magnolia
1 year ago
I think the auditee's department manager would be the best person to consult.
RE
Renay
1 year ago
I think it's important to consult with both the department manager and the audit team to get a well-rounded view.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
That's true, the audit team would have a more objective perspective on the issue.
MA
Maia
1 year ago
But wouldn't the audit team also be a good resource to consult with?
TO
Tommy
1 year ago
I agree, the department manager would have the most insight into the situation.
CO
Cornell
2 years ago
The auditor should consult with the audit team to determine the severity of the finding. They have the necessary expertise and objectivity to make that assessment.
AR
Argelia
1 year ago
Let's make sure to involve them in the decision-making process.
HE
Henriette
1 year ago
I agree, the audit team is the best resource for evaluating the seriousness of the issue.
GE
German
1 year ago
Yes, they have the expertise and objectivity to make that assessment.
HO
Hortencia
1 year ago
We should consult with the audit team to determine the severity of the finding.
RE
Ressie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) client. The client would know the context of the findings better.
DA
Danica
2 years ago
I agree with Franklyn. The audit team would have a better understanding of the overall findings.
FR
Franklyn
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) audit team.