New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 6 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 6
[All CQA Questions]

To determine whether a finding is a minor, isolated incident or a serious, chronic problem, an auditor should consult with the

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Celeste at Jan 10, 2023, 05:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Filiberto
3 months ago
Is it really that straightforward? I have my doubts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
3 months ago
Totally agree, the audit team should be involved too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
Wait, why would the client be consulted? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
I think the quality assurance inspector would have better insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
4 months ago
Definitely the department manager knows the most about ongoing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
4 months ago
I lean towards the client being the right choice since they have the overall perspective, but I wonder if that could lead to bias in the assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
I feel like the quality assurance inspector would have relevant insights, but I can't recall if they have the final say on whether it's a minor or serious issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of the audit team in assessing findings. Maybe they should be consulted too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
5 months ago
I think the auditor should probably consult with the auditee's department manager, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
5 months ago
Okay, I've got it. The team is discussing how improvements are deliberate and achieved through business analysis, so that's describing the "Change" aspect of the business analysis process. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
5 months ago
The memory reservation is clear, but I'm a bit unsure about the high latency sensitivity. Does that mean I need to disable things like power management features? I'll have to research that a bit more to make sure I understand the implications before configuring it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
5 months ago
Key strategy here: look for the option that does NOT fit as a typical error source. That means one of these is probably NOT actually a real problem in the technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if I have enough information to answer this confidently. I might need to make an educated guess and move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
10 months ago
I don't know, guys. Maybe we should ask the janitor. They probably have a better idea of what's really going on than any of those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
10 months ago
The quality assurance inspector? Really? That's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse. The audit team is clearly the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
9 months ago
Consulting with the auditee's quality assurance inspector might not give us the most accurate information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
9 months ago
I agree, the audit team would provide an unbiased assessment of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
9 months ago
Audit team is definitely the best choice. They have the expertise to determine the severity of the finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the client should be involved in this decision. That could introduce some bias. The audit team is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Latonia
9 months ago
Consulting with the auditee's quality assurance inspector could also provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
9 months ago
The audit team would be the best choice to determine the seriousness of the finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
9 months ago
I agree, involving the client could definitely introduce bias.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
10 months ago
I think the auditee's department manager would be the best person to consult. They have the most intimate knowledge of the operations and can provide valuable context.
upvoted 0 times
Sherill
8 months ago
Yes, the audit team can provide an independent perspective on the findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
8 months ago
But wouldn't the audit team also have valuable insights?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
8 months ago
Agreed, they would have a good understanding of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
8 months ago
I think the auditee's department manager would be the best person to consult.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
8 months ago
I think it's important to consult with both the department manager and the audit team to get a well-rounded view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
That's true, the audit team would have a more objective perspective on the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
9 months ago
But wouldn't the audit team also be a good resource to consult with?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
10 months ago
I agree, the department manager would have the most insight into the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cornell
11 months ago
The auditor should consult with the audit team to determine the severity of the finding. They have the necessary expertise and objectivity to make that assessment.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
10 months ago
Let's make sure to involve them in the decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
10 months ago
I agree, the audit team is the best resource for evaluating the seriousness of the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
10 months ago
Yes, they have the expertise and objectivity to make that assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
10 months ago
We should consult with the audit team to determine the severity of the finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) client. The client would know the context of the findings better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
11 months ago
I agree with Franklyn. The audit team would have a better understanding of the overall findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) audit team.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel