An auditor is performing an audit of a drilling machine that produces 100 pieces a day and that is showing improved quality. Which of the following rules should be used for determining the proper sample size for a fixed level of confidence?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CQA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
LI
Ling
1 month ago
D seems too rigid. A fixed 10% doesn't consider quality improvements.
ZA
Zachary
1 month ago
C makes sense too. AQL helps ensure raw material quality is consistent.
VA
Van
2 months ago
I disagree, A is more appropriate. Moving averages give a better trend analysis.
CH
Chandra
2 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Improved quality means we can reduce the sample size.
RO
Roselle
2 months ago
I lean towards B too. Less risk with better quality, right?
FE
Felicidad
2 months ago
D seems too rigid. A 10% sample doesn't consider quality changes.
LO
Lorrie
2 months ago
I disagree, AQL is crucial. C makes sense for raw materials.
DE
Dewitt
2 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Improved quality means we can reduce the sample size.
CH
Chantay
3 months ago
D seems too rigid. A fixed 10% doesn’t consider quality improvements.
MA
Marcelle
3 months ago
C makes sense too. AQL is crucial for raw material assessment.
CH
Chi
3 months ago
I disagree, A is more relevant. Moving averages help track trends effectively.
RA
Rana
3 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Improved quality means we can reduce the sample size.
JO
Johnetta
3 months ago
Totally agree, AQL makes the most sense here!
SO
Sonia
4 months ago
Moving averages aren't really about sample size, right?
JA
Janae
5 months ago
Wait, why would we use a fixed 10% sample size? That seems off.
JI
Jina
5 months ago
I think the sample size should decrease as quality improves!
SY
Sylvie
5 months ago
AQL of the raw material is key for sample size.
MA
Malissa
6 months ago
Quality improving means we should definitely adjust sample size!
ME
Merilyn
6 months ago
Totally agree, moving average isn't really relevant here.
ME
Melynda
6 months ago
Wait, how can we just assume 10% is always right?
OD
Odelia
6 months ago
I think the sample size should decrease with better quality.
KA
Katina
6 months ago
AQL of the raw material is key for sample size!
EL
Elvera
6 months ago
I recall that moving averages can help in understanding trends, but I’m not clear on how they relate to sample size determination in this context.
TE
Terrilyn
7 months ago
I feel like the 10% rule is a common guideline, but I’m not convinced it’s the best approach if quality is changing.
SH
Sherita
7 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we had to decide if the AQL was relevant. I wonder if it applies here too.
JU
Judy
7 months ago
I remember discussing how sample size can be influenced by quality improvements, but I'm not sure if it should always decrease.