MENU
The objective evidence supporting an audit observation must be
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CQA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
AL
Alyce
23 days ago
Right, we need to stick to the facts in the papers.
AL
Alyce
28 days ago
Exactly, A is more about proper documentation.
RI
Rikki
1 month ago
D is too strong. Nonconformance implies a bigger problem.
ME
Meghann
1 month ago
I feel like D could be relevant if it’s a serious issue.
AM
Amalia
1 month ago
True, but they can’t act on it if it’s not in the papers first.
MI
Michel
2 months ago
But what about C? The auditee should know too.
AL
Alyce
2 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. It keeps everything documented.
AL
Alyce
2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Evidence should always be in the working papers.
AM
Amira
2 months ago
I thought verification by the escort was more important?
AL
Alline
2 months ago
Nonconformance is key for accountability!
FR
Frederick
2 months ago
Wait, does it really have to be mentioned to the auditee?
SH
Sheridan
3 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about the documentation.
MA
Mammie
3 months ago
A) recorded on the working papers is a must!
BI
Billy
3 months ago
I feel like I've seen something similar where the evidence had to be documented, so I'm leaning towards A as the best answer.
DO
Domonique
3 months ago
I’m a bit uncertain about whether it has to be mentioned to the auditee or just recorded. I guess it could be both?
JI
Jina
3 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of documenting findings, so I feel like A is definitely a strong contender.
PE
Peter
4 months ago
I think the objective evidence needs to be recorded on the working papers, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.