When coven physical surveillance is not possible, the investigator should
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium ASIS-PCI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
CA
Carin
17 days ago
D is too reckless. We can't ignore the risks involved.
AM
Ammie
22 days ago
C is risky but could yield quick results.
DI
Dino
28 days ago
But closing the case might miss important leads. C could be better.
DE
Devon
1 month ago
B seems reasonable too. If you can't surveil, why continue?
UN
Una
1 month ago
Agreed! A is safer than risking exposure.
MI
Mignon
1 month ago
I think A is the best choice. Technical surveillance can provide valuable insights.
SH
Shenika
2 months ago
D is too reckless. We can't ignore the risks involved.
LY
Lynette
2 months ago
C is risky but could yield quick results.
AN
Anissa
2 months ago
But closing the case might miss important leads. C could be better.
DO
Dona
2 months ago
B seems reasonable too. If you can't surveil, why continue?
NI
Nicolette
2 months ago
Agreed! A is safer than risking exposure.
KR
Krissy
2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Technical surveillance can provide valuable insights.
KA
Katie
3 months ago
D) conducting physical surveillance sounds risky, not worth it!
IN
Inocencia
3 months ago
C) interviewing subjects quickly can yield good info too!
JU
Jutta
3 months ago
Wait, is it really safe to do A) with all the tech out there?
CH
Christiane
3 months ago
I totally disagree, B) closing the case is a waste of time!
TE
Terry
3 months ago
A) attempt technical surveillance is the best option.
LA
Lanie
4 months ago
I recall a case study where closing the case was a last resort. So, option B seems too hasty unless there are no other options.
RE
Remona
5 months ago
I feel like switching to interviews, like in option C, could be a good strategy, but it might not yield the same results as surveillance.
MA
Marg
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where we discussed the risks of ignoring surveillance protocols. Option D seems risky to me.
PH
Phillip
5 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense since technical surveillance can provide valuable information when physical surveillance isn't feasible.