Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASHRM CPHRM Exam - Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Ocie on May 11, 2026 at 11:41 PM

An organization has recently changed insurance. The risk manager receives a claim from a former patient on July 3, 2004, claiming injury and alleging negligence by the surgery staff on September 5, 2003. Which of the following would apply to this claim?

a claims-made policy for the period 1/1/03 to 1/1/04 with a retro date of 1/1/02

an occurrence policy for the period 1/1/03 to 1/1/04

a claims-made policy for the period 1/1/03 to 1/1/04 with a 1-year tail coverage

an occurrence policy for the period 1/1/04 to 1/1/05

Suggested Answer: C

According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, coverage determination depends on both the policy trigger and relevant dates. The alleged negligence occurred on September 5, 2003. Under an occurrence policy in effect from 1/1/03 to 1/1/04, coverage applies because the event occurred during that policy period, regardless of when the claim was filed. Therefore, option 2 applies.

For a claims-made policy covering 1/1/03 to 1/1/04, coverage would require that the claim be made and reported during the policy period unless tail coverage is in place. Because the claim was received on July 3, 2004, after expiration of the 1/1/03 to 1/1/04 claims-made policy, coverage would apply only if a 1-year tail was purchased. Thus, option 3 applies.

Option 1 would not apply because the claim was made after the claims-made policy period ended, and no tail is specified. Option 4 would not apply because occurrence coverage from 1/1/04 to 1/1/05 would not cover an event that occurred in 2003.

Risk financing objectives emphasize understanding policy triggers, reporting requirements, and tail coverage. Therefore, the applicable coverage scenarios are the occurrence policy for 2003 and the claims-made policy with tail coverage.


Get Premium CPHRM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
22 comments · newest first
TY
Tyisha 2 days ago
I think it’s a claims-made policy. The retro date matters.
ER
Erasmo 7 days ago
This question is tricky. I feel unsure about the policies.
ST
Starr 13 days ago
I feel like the occurrence policy is safer. Claims-made feels risky here.
WH
Whitley 18 days ago
Option A could work too, but I doubt the retro date's impact.
BE
Bettina 23 days ago
I lean towards option C. The tail coverage makes sense for the timeline.
PA
Paz 28 days ago
I agree, but claims-made might also apply due to the retro date.
RI
Rikki 1 month ago
I think it's about the timing of the claim. Occurrence policy seems right.
AL
Alverta 1 month ago
This question is tricky. I feel unsure about the policies.
BA
Barb 1 month ago
The retro date is key, but I still think the claims-made option is tricky.
AL
Aleshia 2 months ago
Totally agree, the occurrence policy makes the most sense here!
SH
Shanda 2 months ago
Wait, how can they claim negligence from a surgery that happened so long ago?
CE
Celestina 2 months ago
I think it's definitely a claims-made policy since the injury was reported later.
RA
Ramonita 2 months ago
This claim is from 2003, so it falls under the occurrence policy.
LA
Laurel 2 months ago
Totally agree, the timing is crucial here!
EM
Emilio 2 months ago
Wait, how can they claim negligence from a surgery that happened a year earlier?
LA
Lamonica 3 months ago
Definitely not the 1/04 to 1/05 policy, that's too late!
LI
Lindsay 3 months ago
I think it could be claims-made too, depending on the retro date.
DI
Dianne 3 months ago
This claim is from 2003, so it falls under the occurrence policy.
LE
Leanora 3 months ago
I feel like I need to double-check the tail coverage concept. If the claim was made after the policy ended, does that mean option 3 is definitely out?
SH
Shantay 3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the timing of the claim was crucial. I think the occurrence policy might apply here since the injury happened before the policy period.
ER
Eric 4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the retroactive date. Does that mean the claim could still be covered under the claims-made policy?
JE
Jess 5 months ago
I remember that claims-made policies only cover claims made during the policy period, so I think options 1 and 3 might be relevant.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel