New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.18 Exam - Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.18 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 3
[All S90.18 Questions]

The requirement to defer security related state data at runtime relates directly to the application of which service-orientation principle?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jolanda at Jul 05, 2023, 07:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.18 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ailene
3 months ago
I have my doubts about that answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
Nope, it's definitely not D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
Surprised it's not Service Abstraction!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
4 months ago
I thought it was Service Loose Coupling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
4 months ago
Definitely Service Autonomy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
4 months ago
I’m not confident, but I feel like none of the options fully capture the essence of deferring state data. Maybe "None of the above" could be the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards Service Loose Coupling, but I could be mixing it up with another concept. I need to recall how state data impacts service interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about service abstraction, but I don't think that's the right answer here. It feels more about how services interact rather than state management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
5 months ago
I think the principle might be Service Autonomy, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems to relate to how services manage their own state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Let me re-read it carefully and see if I can eliminate some of the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, and I want to make sure I don't accidentally choose the wrong answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the Economic Espionage Act. I'll need to carefully review the different sections to determine which one matches the description provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
10 months ago
I bet the correct answer is 'Service Abstraction'. Hiding the security details is like keeping your superhero identity a secret - it's all about that sweet, sweet abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
8 months ago
C) Service Abstraction
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
9 months ago
B) Service Autonomy
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
9 months ago
A) Service Loose Coupling
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
10 months ago
Well, this is a head-scratcher. My gut instinct is to go with 'None of the above', but I can't shake the feeling that I'm missing something. Maybe I should have paid more attention in that service-orientation lecture...
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
8 months ago
D) None of the above.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 months ago
C) Service Abstraction
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
8 months ago
B) Service Autonomy
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
8 months ago
A) Service Loose Coupling
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
9 months ago
D) None of the above.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
9 months ago
C) Service Abstraction
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
D) None of the above.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
9 months ago
B) Service Autonomy
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
10 months ago
A) Service Loose Coupling
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
10 months ago
C) Service Abstraction
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
10 months ago
B) Service Autonomy
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
10 months ago
A) Service Loose Coupling
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sol
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) Service Abstraction, as it helps hide the complexity of security implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
11 months ago
I agree with Tien, because deferring security related state data at runtime allows services to operate independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Service Autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
11 months ago
But deferring security related state data at runtime allows services to operate independently, so it aligns with the principle of service autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
11 months ago
Oh, I know this one! It's definitely Service Abstraction. Keeping the security implementation details hidden is key to maintaining a clean, abstract service interface.
upvoted 0 times
Sherman
10 months ago
Oh, I see. So it's not Service Abstraction after all. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
10 months ago
Actually, it's Service Autonomy. That's the principle that emphasizes the ability of a service to control its own state and behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be Service Loose Coupling. That also sounds important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
10 months ago
I think it's Service Abstraction too. It helps to keep the security details separate from the service logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Service Autonomy seems like a stretch, but I can't really see how the other options fit either. Guess I need to brush up on my service-orientation principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
11 months ago
Hmm, I think this relates to the Service Abstraction principle. Deferring security-related state data helps keep the service implementation details hidden from the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) Service Loose Coupling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Service Autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel