Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.18 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Service A supports WS-Security and Service B does not. How can they exchange secure messages?
D) None of the above.
A) WS-Security regulates identity stores and therefore does not prohibit Service A and Service B from exchanging secure messages.
B) Service B can be designed to support XML Canonicalization instead. This enables Service B to be compatible with any service that supports WS-Security.
C) As long as both services share the same public key. it doesn't matter whether WS-Security is supported.

Arcitura Education S90.18 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.18 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All S90.18 Questions]

Service A supports WS-Security and Service B does not. How can they exchange secure messages?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Marjory at May 08, 2022, 08:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.18 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katlyn
10 months ago
None of these options seem right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
10 months ago
Sharing a public key is key, but WS-Security adds extra layers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
11 months ago
Wait, can they really exchange secure messages without WS-Security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
11 months ago
I think B is the best option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
11 months ago
Service A and B can still communicate securely with the right setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
11 months ago
I'm not totally sure about the order, but I think it has something to do with the way the components interact with each other. I'll have to carefully consider the relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The Scrum Guide says the Product Owner is responsible for managing the Product Backlog and ensuring the value is maximized. So it makes sense that they would have the power to cancel a Sprint if needed. I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
11 months ago
Conflict of interest? That doesn't seem like it would be a countermeasure for protecting cloud operations. I'll go with A for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel