Legacy systems often rely upon a combination of proprietary data models, proprietary data formats, and proprietary transport protocols. For this reason the Legacy Wrapper pattern is often used together with which of the following patterns?
Service Broker, definitely. It's like using a translator to communicate with that weird uncle who still uses a rotary phone. The Legacy Wrapper is the interpreter, and the Service Broker is the cool middleman making it all work.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe the Atomic Service Transaction pattern could work, since it ensures data consistency even with legacy systems. But the Service Broker seems like the most likely choice here.
I think the correct answer is C) Service Broker. The Legacy Wrapper pattern is specifically designed to work with proprietary systems, and the Service Broker pattern is perfect for integrating those systems with modern architectures.
The Legacy Wrapper pattern is often used with the Service Broker pattern to handle the proprietary nature of legacy systems. This makes sense, as the Service Broker can act as an intermediary between the legacy system and modern services.
Nieves
6 days agoShawnee
13 days agoKara
1 days agoLetha
25 days agoShonda
1 months agoEladia
1 days agoMalcolm
18 days agoFletcher
1 months agoMelodie
1 months agoAlpha
1 months ago