If a service consumer program needs to get data from a service that is not available, it can poll the service by periodically issuing a request message. This type of interaction can be inefficient because it can lead to unnecessary message transmissions. Which of the following statements describes a solution to this problem?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium S90.08 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
JA
Jackie
1 month ago
A could work too, but it feels more complex.
MA
Maile
1 month ago
I agree, B makes sense. No need to keep polling.
TA
Tamar
2 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Automatic notifications sound efficient.
KR
Kristel
2 months ago
Just to clarify, polling can lead to unnecessary traffic, right?
GL
Glenna
2 months ago
Wait, are we really saying polling is still a thing? That seems outdated!
VA
Vallie
2 months ago
C sounds interesting, but I'm not sure it really addresses the polling issue.
CA
Cassie
2 months ago
I think A could work too, but it seems a bit complicated.
MA
Mary
2 months ago
B is definitely the way to go! Event-driven is much more efficient.
TE
Tennie
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because I don’t think any of these really tackle the polling inefficiency directly.
CE
Cecily
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed how event-driven systems can improve efficiency. I feel like option B is the best fit here.
DE
Delila
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the Messaging Metadata pattern might not fully address the polling issue since it focuses on avoiding duplicates rather than reducing unnecessary requests.
NA
Natalie
3 months ago
I remember studying the Event-Driven Messaging pattern, and it seems like it would help with notifying consumers instead of them polling constantly.