MENU
Which of the following statements are true?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium S90.08 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
JU
Julene
11 months ago
Wait, can someone explain how A is true? I'm a bit confused!
LE
Leonida
11 months ago
D seems off, I thought redundancy was all about availability too.
RY
Ryan
11 months ago
C sounds right, load balancing is super important for redundancy.
VA
Val
11 months ago
I think B is spot on, eliminating single points of failure is key!
ER
Erick
12 months ago
A is definitely true, non-agnostic logic needs redundancy.
LA
Lashaunda
12 months ago
A seems off to me; I thought the pattern was more about availability rather than just non-agnostic logic.
KE
Keith
1 year ago
I vaguely recall that the Intermediate Routing pattern can help with load balancing, so C might be true, but I need to double-check that.
CO
Colene
1 year ago
I remember discussing the Redundant Implementation pattern in class, and I feel like it does have something to do with availability, so maybe D is incorrect?
LI
Lisandra
1 year ago
I think option B sounds familiar, like it relates to avoiding single points of failure, but I'm not entirely sure.
RO
Ronnie
1 year ago
The last statement is throwing me off a bit. I thought the Redundant Implementation pattern was more about availability than scalability. I'll need to double-check that one.
KI
Kimberlie
1 year ago
The third statement mentions using the Intermediate Routing pattern to load balance access to a redundantly deployed service. I'm not as familiar with that, but it seems like a reasonable combination, so I'll go with true on that one.
BE
Ben
1 year ago
The second statement is about the pattern addressing single point of failure issues for actively reused services. That sounds right, so I'll check that one as well.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The first statement seems to be about the usefulness of the pattern for services with non-agnostic logic. I think I remember that from the lectures, so I'll mark that one as true.
SC
Scarlet
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through each statement and think about which ones are true based on my understanding of the Redundant Implementation pattern.
AL
Aleisha
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure how to approach this. I'll need to think carefully about what counts as a "wasteful activity" and how I can improve the process by removing those.
KI
Kiera
1 year ago
Ah, the Redundant Implementation pattern - where failure is an option, but only if you have a backup plan. It's like the software equivalent of a cat with nine lives.
OT
Otis
1 year ago
Option D is way off base. The Redundant Implementation pattern is all about improving availability, not scalability. Somebody needs to go back and read the pattern description again.
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
Option D is way off base. The Redundant Implementation pattern is all about improving availability, not scalability. Somebody needs to go back and read the pattern description again.
KA
Katheryn
1 year ago
C) The Redundant Implementation pattern can be supplemented with the Intermediate Routing pattern, which can be applied to load balance access to a redundantly deployed service.
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
B) The Redundant Implementation pattern is concerned with eliminating single point of failure problems associated with services that are actively reused.
AU
Audry
1 year ago
A) The Redundant Implementation pattern is most useful for services that possess non-agnostic service logic.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
Option C is great, the Intermediate Routing pattern can definitely be used in conjunction with Redundant Implementation to load balance the redundant service instances. It's like a dynamic load balancing superhero team!
OL
Olive
1 year ago
Definitely, combining these patterns can help address both scalability and availability issues.
CO
Coleen
1 year ago
Yes, it's like having a dynamic load balancing superhero team working together to ensure availability.
EL
Eliseo
1 year ago
I agree, using the Intermediate Routing pattern with Redundant Implementation can definitely help with load balancing.
RI
Rickie
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the correct answer. The Redundant Implementation pattern is all about eliminating single points of failure, which is crucial for highly reused services.
CA
Carma
1 year ago
Definitely, option B is the way to go. Single points of failure can be a big problem.
KA
Karl
1 year ago
Yes, option B is the most relevant. It's important for ensuring high availability.
EI
Eileen
1 year ago
Definitely, having redundant implementations can help ensure availability and prevent downtime.
IV
Ivan
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer. It's all about eliminating single points of failure.
AL
Alease
1 year ago
That makes sense. It's important for services that are actively reused to address those issues.
JE
Jesusa
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer. It's all about eliminating single points of failure.
CA
Carmen
2 years ago
But doesn't the Redundant Implementation pattern address scalability, not availability?
JU
Justine
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
CO
Cordie
2 years ago
Hmm, option A seems to be on the right track, but I'm not sure if 'non-agnostic service logic' is the right term here. Isn't the pattern more about redundancy and availability rather than service logic?
BE
Bette
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I think the focus is more on redundancy and availability rather than service logic.
TR
Tracey
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A is correct, but I agree that the term 'non-agnostic service logic' seems a bit off.
CA
Carmen
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.