Ah, the Redundant Implementation pattern - where failure is an option, but only if you have a backup plan. It's like the software equivalent of a cat with nine lives.
Option D is way off base. The Redundant Implementation pattern is all about improving availability, not scalability. Somebody needs to go back and read the pattern description again.
Option C is great, the Intermediate Routing pattern can definitely be used in conjunction with Redundant Implementation to load balance the redundant service instances. It's like a dynamic load balancing superhero team!
Option B is definitely the correct answer. The Redundant Implementation pattern is all about eliminating single points of failure, which is crucial for highly reused services.
Hmm, option A seems to be on the right track, but I'm not sure if 'non-agnostic service logic' is the right term here. Isn't the pattern more about redundancy and availability rather than service logic?
Kiera
14 days agoOtis
15 days agoShawnda
18 days agoRickie
1 months agoAlease
8 days agoJesusa
16 days agoCarmen
2 months agoJustine
2 months agoCordie
2 months agoBette
30 days agoTracey
1 months agoCarmen
2 months ago