Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education S90.03 Exam - Topic 6 Question 123 Discussion

A(n) __________________ in the extent to which the Service Reusability principle is applied to a service can result in a(n) __________________ in the potential for the service to be repeatedly composed. SELECT ALL THAT APPLY
A) decrease, decrease and D) increase, increase
B) increase, decrease
C) decrease, increase

Arcitura Education S90.03 Exam - Topic 6 Question 123 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.03 exam
Question #: 123
Topic #: 6
[All S90.03 Questions]

A(n) __________________ in the extent to which the Service Reusability principle is applied to a service can result in a(n) __________________ in the potential for the service to be repeatedly composed. SELECT ALL THAT APPLY

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jamal
3 days ago
Wait, how can reusability decrease and still lead to more compositions? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
I think D) increase, increase is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
2 months ago
Definitely C) decrease, increase. Makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think I leaned towards A because a decrease in reusability seems like it would definitely decrease composition potential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
3 months ago
This question feels familiar, but I can't recall the exact details. I wonder if B could be a trick option since it mentions both decrease and increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like an increase in reusability should lead to an increase in composition potential, which makes D seem likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
3 months ago
I think I remember that if reusability decreases, it might limit how often a service can be composed, so maybe C is right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel