Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.03 Exam - Topic 5 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.03 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 5
[All S90.03 Questions]

Which of the following is not a benefit associated with silo-based application design? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Precious at Sep 17, 2024, 01:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.03 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alline
5 months ago
I thought reuse was a big deal in silo design?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
5 months ago
B makes sense, less long-term hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
I disagree, D seems more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
6 months ago
A is definitely a benefit!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option B; it seems like ignoring long-term requirements could complicate things rather than simplify the design process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question about application design benefits, and I feel like option C might be misleading since building from scratch isn't always a benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
6 months ago
I think option D sounds wrong because I recall that silo applications are often not built for reuse, which can be a major drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
6 months ago
I remember discussing how silo-based designs can sometimes lead to short-term gains, but I'm not sure if that makes them predictable in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
6 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this. I'll start by identifying the benefits of silo-based design, then select the option that doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
6 months ago
Ugh, I'm really struggling with this one. The options all sound like they could be benefits of silo-based design. I need to re-read the question and think it through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the concept of silo-based design before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and eliminate the ones that are clearly benefits of silo-based design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the option that is not a benefit of silo-based design. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
7 months ago
Hmm, the wording is a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options to identify the right pattern to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
Option D? Reuse across silos? That's like trying to dig a hole and fill it at the same time. Talk about a self-defeating design strategy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
11 months ago
Option D is just plain silly. If applications were built for repeated reuse, we wouldn't be having this discussion about the downsides of silo-based design in the first place!
upvoted 0 times
Mattie
10 months ago
C) The latest technology advancements can be leveraged by repeatedly building new applications from the ground up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
10 months ago
B) The analysis and design of applications are easier because strategic (long-term) business requirements don't usually need to be taken into account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
11 months ago
A) The emphasis on fulfilling tactical (short-term) business requirements allows for a more predictable application delivery lifecycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earnestine
11 months ago
Option C seems like the correct answer to me. Constantly building new applications from scratch instead of reusing existing components is a major downside of silo-based design.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
10 months ago
User 3: Yeah, reusing existing components can save time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, constantly building new applications from scratch can be a major downside.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
User 1: I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabra
12 months ago
Option B is definitely not correct. Ignoring strategic requirements is a recipe for disaster in the long run. We need to balance both short-term and long-term needs.
upvoted 0 times
Marci
10 months ago
I agree, we definitely need to consider both short-term and long-term requirements for a successful application design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
11 months ago
D) Applications are always inherently built for repeated reuse across silos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
C) The latest technology advancements can be leveraged by repeatedly building new applications from the ground up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
11 months ago
A) The emphasis on fulfilling tactical (short-term) business requirements allows for a more predictable application delivery lifecycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
12 months ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure if it's the correct answer. Fulfilling tactical requirements is important, but I feel like we should also consider long-term strategic needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
But silo-based design doesn't always prioritize reusability, so D is not a benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel