MENU
As a first step toward replacing a corporate customer database, a company attempts to limit access to customer services via an official Customer entity service. However, some time later it is discovered that several applications have been bypassing the Customer service in order to directly access the customer database. As a result, these applications exhibit which negative form of coupling? Select the correct answer.
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium S90.03 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
DE
Delsie
2 months ago
I see your points, but I believe it’s C) Consumer-to-Contract. The apps ignore the service contract.
VE
Verlene
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A) Contract-to-Implementation. It’s about the contract not being followed.
JO
Jose
2 months ago
I feel that too! Direct access means apps are tied to the database structure.
SA
Samira
2 months ago
This is tricky! I think it's B) Consumer-to-Implementation.
OC
Ocie
2 months ago
D) Contract-to-Technology could also apply. Technology should enforce the contract, right?
SH
Shawna
2 months ago
I see both sides, but I feel C) Consumer-to-Contract fits better. Direct access breaks the contract.
MA
Marquetta
3 months ago
I agree, but I lean towards A) Contract-to-Implementation. It's about the contract not being followed.
KA
Kayleigh
3 months ago
I think it's B) Consumer-to-Implementation. It makes sense.
CH
Cheryll
3 months ago
I agree with Georgene. C) makes sense. They ignored the agreed terms!
GE
Georgene
3 months ago
I lean towards C) Consumer-to-Contract. They bypassed the service, so it's a contract issue.
NI
Nicholle
3 months ago
I feel like it's A) Contract-to-Implementation. The apps should follow the contract.
MI
Mila
4 months ago
This is tricky! I think it's B) Consumer-to-Implementation.
AL
Alishia
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not D) Contract-to-Technology? Sounds plausible!
QU
Quentin
4 months ago
I disagree, it feels more like C) Consumer-to-Contract to me.
RU
Ruth
5 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize this could happen so easily!
MA
Magdalene
6 months ago
I thought it might be A) Contract-to-Implementation. Not so sure now.
DI
Dino
6 months ago
Definitely B) Consumer-to-Implementation. That's a classic case!
DO
Dorinda
6 months ago
This is why we need better access controls!
LA
Lashawnda
6 months ago
I thought it was Consumer-to-Contract at first.
CO
Cornell
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not Contract-to-Technology?
SH
Shawnda
6 months ago
Totally agree, it's a classic case of tight coupling.
AL
Allene
7 months ago
That's definitely Consumer-to-Implementation.
ME
Melodie
7 months ago
I feel like this is a trick question. The applications bypassing the service makes me lean towards Consumer-to-Implementation, but I’m not completely confident in that choice.
AM
Amber
7 months ago
I have a vague recollection of the definitions, but I’m confused. I thought Contract-to-Implementation was about how contracts are tied to specific implementations. Could that be relevant here?
ME
Melodie
7 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question we did on service interfaces. I think the answer might be Consumer-to-Contract since the applications are ignoring the official service.
FR
Franklyn
7 months ago
I remember studying about coupling types, but I'm not entirely sure which one fits this scenario. It feels like it could be Consumer-to-Implementation, but I need to think it through more.