Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.03 Exam - Topic 3 Question 89 Discussion

Which of the following statements describes service re-composability, as it relates to the Service Composability principle? Select the correct answer.
A) I have a service that is part of a service composition. and C) I have a service that is part of 2 service compositions. and D) I have 2 service compositions that are part of 2 service inventories.
B) I have a service composition with 5 services.

Arcitura Education S90.03 Exam - Topic 3 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.03 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 3
[All S90.03 Questions]

Which of the following statements describes service re-composability, as it relates to the Service Composability principle? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, D

by Gilbert at May 28, 2024, 10:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.03 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fernanda
8 months ago
A is just about being part of a composition, not re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
8 months ago
Wait, can a service really be in two compositions? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
8 months ago
Not sure about that, D seems more accurate to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
8 months ago
I think C is the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
9 months ago
Service re-composability means services can be reused in different compositions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
9 months ago
I’m confused; I thought service re-composability was more about the overall structure rather than just counting services. Maybe it’s D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the answer might relate to how many compositions a single service can be part of. So, C seems likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about compositions needing to be flexible. Could it be A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
9 months ago
I think service re-composability is about how services can be reused in different compositions, so maybe it's C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
9 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally confident, but I think option C is the best fit based on my understanding of service-oriented architecture principles. I'll give that a try and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
9 months ago
I've got a good feeling about option C. Allowing a service to be part of multiple compositions seems like a key aspect of re-composability, which is what this question is asking about. I'll go with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'm not entirely sure what the "Service Composability principle" is referring to. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the key concepts before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
9 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I think option C might be the correct answer, since it describes a service that is part of multiple service compositions. That seems to align with the concept of re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
9 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing my understanding of service re-composability. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how they relate to the Service Composability principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
10 months ago
I think the answer is A, Programming and training. That's the phase where the actual software is built based on the design, and the documentation and training materials are developed to support the final product. The key is that the software and components are faithfully implementing the original design at this stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. The subnet 192.168.1.0/24 would be represented as 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 in the hosts.allow file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
1 year ago
I'll have to agree with the others. Option C is the way to go - it's the only one that really nails the concept of service re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with C as well. That's the only option that really captures the essence of service re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
Definitely going with C. The ability to reuse a service across multiple compositions is crucial for service-oriented architectures.
upvoted 0 times
Kirby
1 year ago
User3: D seems like the right choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
User2: I believe it's C, reusing a service in multiple compositions is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 year ago
User1: I think A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
1 year ago
It helps with flexibility and efficiency in architecture design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
1 year ago
That's correct! Reusing services in multiple compositions is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
1 year ago
C) I have a service that is part of 2 service compositions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ling
1 year ago
Option C makes the most sense to me. A service that can be used in different compositions is a key aspect of service re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
1 year ago
I think option D is the correct answer. It talks about service compositions being part of service inventories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think option B is the most accurate. It mentions having multiple services in a composition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 year ago
I disagree, option C is the best choice. It talks about a service being part of multiple compositions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
1 year ago
I think option A is correct. It mentions a service being part of a service composition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josphine
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Having a service that is part of multiple service compositions demonstrates service re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
Yuriko
1 year ago
User2: I agree, having a service that is part of multiple service compositions shows re-composability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
1 year ago
User1: I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malinda
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's about how a service can be reused in different compositions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) I have a service that is part of 2 service compositions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) I have a service that is part of a service composition.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel