New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education S90.03 Exam - Topic 3 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.03 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 3
[All S90.03 Questions]

Which service-orientation principle would be used to justify a corporate policy that limits or restricts access to technical specifications that show design and technology details about the underlying implementation of a published service? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Glenn
2 months ago
Surprised this is even a question! Seems obvious to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
3 months ago
Totally agree with that! Keeps the implementation hidden.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
3 months ago
Wait, isn't it more about C? Service Autonomy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
I don't know, I feel like A could fit too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
3 months ago
I think it's definitely D, Service Abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
3 months ago
I thought Service Abstraction was about hiding complexity, but I'm not confident if that's the right answer here. What if it's actually Service Statelessness?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced on service design principles, but I can't recall the exact term. Could it be Service Discoverability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how limiting access can help maintain service integrity. Maybe it's Service Autonomy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
4 months ago
I think the principle we're looking for is related to hiding implementation details, which sounds like it could be Service Abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is D, Service Abstraction. That principle is all about encapsulating the underlying technology and only exposing the service interface, which aligns with the scenario described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
4 months ago
Okay, I've got it. The answer is D, Service Abstraction. This principle is about hiding the internal implementation details of a service, which is what the question is asking about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the service-orientation principles, but I'm not sure which one specifically would apply to limiting access to technical specs. Let me think this through...
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
5 months ago
I think this is asking about the service-orientation principle that would justify restricting access to technical details. The key seems to be "service abstraction", which hides the underlying implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
9 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with service abstraction on this one. Gotta keep those implementation secrets under lock and key!
upvoted 0 times
Goldie
7 months ago
Agreed, it's all about protecting the underlying implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
7 months ago
Definitely, it helps maintain the independence of the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
7 months ago
Yeah, it's important to keep those details hidden from users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
8 months ago
I think service abstraction makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janae
9 months ago
Haha, good luck trying to get any IT guy to give up their precious technical details! Service autonomy all the way.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
8 months ago
True, but service autonomy ensures that the service has control over its own functionality and data, which is crucial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
8 months ago
But wouldn't service abstraction also be important in this case to hide the complexity of the underlying implementation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
8 months ago
I agree, service autonomy is key when it comes to protecting those technical details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
9 months ago
Definitely, we need to limit access to certain details for security reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
9 months ago
I agree, service autonomy is key in protecting sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thaddeus
9 months ago
I see where you're coming from, Tashia, but I still think D) Service Abstraction is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Service Autonomy could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
9 months ago
Service discoverability is important, but in this case, restricting access to the technical specs is more about service abstraction, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
8 months ago
Service discoverability is important, but in this case, service abstraction seems to be the main principle at play.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
9 months ago
That's a good point, service autonomy does play a role in controlling access to certain information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
9 months ago
I think service autonomy could also be a factor in limiting access to technical specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
9 months ago
Yes, you're right. It's all about service abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
I think service abstraction makes the most sense here. Hiding the implementation details helps protect the service's autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
8 months ago
Service abstraction definitely makes sense in this scenario to hide the implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
8 months ago
I think service autonomy is the best choice to limit access to technical specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
9 months ago
I agree, service abstraction would help protect the service's autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Von
10 months ago
I agree with Cyril. Service Abstraction makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
10 months ago
I think the answer is D) Service Abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel