Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.03 Topic 3 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.03 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 3
[All S90.03 Questions]

Which service-orientation principle would be used to justify a corporate policy that limits or restricts access to technical specifications that show design and technology details about the underlying implementation of a published service? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Blondell
2 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with service abstraction on this one. Gotta keep those implementation secrets under lock and key!
upvoted 0 times
Goldie
23 days ago
Agreed, it's all about protecting the underlying implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
1 months ago
Definitely, it helps maintain the independence of the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 months ago
Yeah, it's important to keep those details hidden from users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
1 months ago
I think service abstraction makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janae
2 months ago
Haha, good luck trying to get any IT guy to give up their precious technical details! Service autonomy all the way.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
1 months ago
True, but service autonomy ensures that the service has control over its own functionality and data, which is crucial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 months ago
But wouldn't service abstraction also be important in this case to hide the complexity of the underlying implementation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
2 months ago
I agree, service autonomy is key when it comes to protecting those technical details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
2 months ago
Definitely, we need to limit access to certain details for security reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 months ago
I agree, service autonomy is key in protecting sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thaddeus
3 months ago
I see where you're coming from, Tashia, but I still think D) Service Abstraction is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Service Autonomy could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
Service discoverability is important, but in this case, restricting access to the technical specs is more about service abstraction, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
2 months ago
Service discoverability is important, but in this case, service abstraction seems to be the main principle at play.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 months ago
That's a good point, service autonomy does play a role in controlling access to certain information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
3 months ago
I think service autonomy could also be a factor in limiting access to technical specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
3 months ago
Yes, you're right. It's all about service abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
3 months ago
I think service abstraction makes the most sense here. Hiding the implementation details helps protect the service's autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
2 months ago
Service abstraction definitely makes sense in this scenario to hide the implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I think service autonomy is the best choice to limit access to technical specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
2 months ago
I agree, service abstraction would help protect the service's autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Von
3 months ago
I agree with Cyril. Service Abstraction makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
4 months ago
I think the answer is D) Service Abstraction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel