New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All S90.02 Questions]

Which of the following statements does not make sense? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Talia
3 months ago
Wait, can you really share schemas like that? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
3 months ago
A makes sense, but I'm not sure about B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
3 months ago
D can't be right, something's gotta be wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
4 months ago
I think B is a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
4 months ago
A and C are totally valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
I want to say that option B might be the one that doesn't make sense, but I can't quite remember why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where WSDL definitions were linked to schemas, but I can't recall if sharing them is a problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
4 months ago
I think option D is tricky because it suggests all statements are correct, but I feel like one of them might not be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
5 months ago
I remember studying WSDL and XML schemas, but I'm not sure if sharing schemas is always allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident in my understanding of SOAP and XML, so I think I can tackle this question successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to determine which statement is the odd one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
5 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward to me. Each WSDL definition having its own XML schema makes the most sense conceptually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'll need to review my notes on SOAP web services and XML schemas to make sure I understand the relationships between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through each statement and think about whether it makes logical sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward configuration question. I think the answer is B, C, and E - Configurable, Allowed, and Required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different tiles and what they represent in the Service Mapping Home page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
5 months ago
I'm not too familiar with the IBM storage product lineup, so I'll have to make an educated guess on this one. I'll go with A, IBM Spectrum Control, since that sounds like it could be the right fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the different working modes for UPS systems. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I have this concept down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
10 months ago
Option B, for sure. Sharing a WSDL definition across multiple schemas? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Talk about a coding nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
10 months ago
Option D? Really? All of those statements make sense? Clearly, the person who wrote this question has never actually built a web service before.
upvoted 0 times
Olen
9 months ago
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
10 months ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherita
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with option B as the correct answer. Sharing a WSDL definition across multiple XML schemas? Sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
My
8 months ago
Melvin: Definitely, option B is the odd one out here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
9 months ago
User 3: Option A seems more logical, with shared XML schema for multiple WSDL definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, sharing a WSDL definition across multiple XML schemas doesn't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
10 months ago
User 1: I agree, option B definitely doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coleen
10 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
10 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
10 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
11 months ago
I agree, option B is the odd one out here. The rest seem to be valid statements about web services and XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
9 months ago
I think you're right. The other options all describe valid scenarios for building web services and XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
9 months ago
Option B is definitely the odd one out. It doesn't make sense to have two XML schemas shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
9 months ago
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
10 months ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
11 months ago
Option B doesn't make sense. You can't have a WSDL definition sharing the same XML schema, that's just not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
9 months ago
D) Yeah, option B is definitely incorrect. It doesn't follow the standard structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
9 months ago
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
10 months ago
B) I agree, option B doesn't make sense. You can't have a WSDL definition sharing the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
10 months ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel