Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Which of the following statements does not make sense? Select the correct answer.
D) All of the above statements make sense.
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All S90.02 Questions]

Which of the following statements does not make sense? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Shawna at Dec 13, 2023, 06:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Talia
8 months ago
Wait, can you really share schemas like that? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
8 months ago
A makes sense, but I'm not sure about B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
8 months ago
D can't be right, something's gotta be wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
8 months ago
I think B is a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
9 months ago
A and C are totally valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
9 months ago
I want to say that option B might be the one that doesn't make sense, but I can't quite remember why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where WSDL definitions were linked to schemas, but I can't recall if sharing them is a problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
9 months ago
I think option D is tricky because it suggests all statements are correct, but I feel like one of them might not be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
9 months ago
I remember studying WSDL and XML schemas, but I'm not sure if sharing schemas is always allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident in my understanding of SOAP and XML, so I think I can tackle this question successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to determine which statement is the odd one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
9 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward to me. Each WSDL definition having its own XML schema makes the most sense conceptually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'll need to review my notes on SOAP web services and XML schemas to make sure I understand the relationships between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
9 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through each statement and think about whether it makes logical sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward configuration question. I think the answer is B, C, and E - Configurable, Allowed, and Required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different tiles and what they represent in the Service Mapping Home page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
10 months ago
I'm not too familiar with the IBM storage product lineup, so I'll have to make an educated guess on this one. I'll go with A, IBM Spectrum Control, since that sounds like it could be the right fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the different working modes for UPS systems. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I have this concept down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
1 year ago
Option B, for sure. Sharing a WSDL definition across multiple schemas? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Talk about a coding nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
Option D? Really? All of those statements make sense? Clearly, the person who wrote this question has never actually built a web service before.
upvoted 0 times
Olen
1 year ago
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
1 year ago
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with option B as the correct answer. Sharing a WSDL definition across multiple XML schemas? Sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
My
1 year ago
Melvin: Definitely, option B is the odd one out here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 year ago
User 3: Option A seems more logical, with shared XML schema for multiple WSDL definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, sharing a WSDL definition across multiple XML schemas doesn't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option B definitely doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coleen
1 year ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
1 year ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the odd one out here. The rest seem to be valid statements about web services and XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
1 year ago
I think you're right. The other options all describe valid scenarios for building web services and XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the odd one out. It doesn't make sense to have two XML schemas shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
1 year ago
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 year ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
Option B doesn't make sense. You can't have a WSDL definition sharing the same XML schema, that's just not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
1 year ago
D) Yeah, option B is definitely incorrect. It doesn't follow the standard structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 year ago
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
B) I agree, option B doesn't make sense. You can't have a WSDL definition sharing the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 year ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel